Paper 109 : The Value of Figurative Language: An Evaluation in Light of I.A. Richards’ Theories

Assignment of  Paper 109 :  Literary Theory & Criticism and Indian Aesthetics

Topic : The Value of Figurative Language: An Evaluation in Light of I.A. Richards’ Theories

Table of Contents:-

• Personal Information
• Assignment Details
• Abstract
• Key Words
• Introduction
• The Value of Figurative Language
• The Role of Figurative Language in Communication and Meaning
• Psychological and Cognitive Aspects of Figurative Language
• Figurative Language in Literary Criticism and Poetry Analysis
• Common Misunderstandings in Interpreting Figurative Language
• Strategies for Effectively Interpreting Figurative Language
• The Impact of Figurative Language on Reader Engagement and Comprehension
• The Evolution of Figurative Language in Modern Literature
• The Role of Figurative Language in Different Literary Genres
• Influence of Figurative Language on Modern Literary Theory

Personal Information:-

• Name :- Rutvi Pal
• Batch :- M.A. Sem 2 (2024-2026)
• Enrollment Number :- 5108240025
• E-mail Address :-rutvipal4@gmail.com
• Roll Number :- 23

Assignment Details:-

• Topic: The Value of Figurative Language: An Evaluation in Light of I.A. Richards’ Theories
• Paper & subject code :-109 -Literary Theory & Criticism and Indian Aesthetics - 22402
• Submitted to :- Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar
• Date of Submission :- 17  April , 2025

 Abstract

Figurative language is an essential component of both literary and non-literary discourse, significantly influencing how meaning is constructed and interpreted. This paper explores the value of figurative language, particularly in the context of I.A. Richards’ theories of literary criticism and semantic interpretation. Through his concepts of the "tenor and vehicle" in metaphor and his emphasis on the psychological and cognitive processes involved in interpretation, Richards highlights the profound impact of figurative expressions on communication and comprehension. This study examines the role of figurative language in shaping literary meaning, its cognitive and psychological effects on readers, and its significance in different literary genres. Additionally, the paper discusses the challenges and common misunderstandings associated with interpreting figurative language, along with strategies to enhance understanding. The evolution of figurative language in modern literature and its influence on contemporary literary theory are also explored. By drawing from Richards' theoretical framework and incorporating modern literary perspectives, this study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of figurative language’s enduring relevance and transformative potential in literature and communication.

Keywords

Figurative language, I.A. Richards, metaphor, semantics, literary criticism, cognition, modern literature, literary theory, interpretation, communication

Introduction

Figurative language, encompassing metaphors, similes, personification, and other rhetorical devices, is an integral element of human communication and literary expression. It transcends literal meanings to evoke emotions, create imagery, and enhance the depth of meaning in both spoken and written discourse. The significance of figurative language extends beyond artistic embellishment, as it plays a crucial role in shaping human cognition, communication, and the interpretation of texts.

The theoretical foundation for understanding the value of figurative language was significantly developed by I.A. Richards, one of the most influential literary critics of the 20th century. His work, The Meaning of Meaning (co-authored with C.K. Ogden) and Practical Criticism, laid the groundwork for modern approaches to metaphor and semantics. Richards introduced the concept of the "tenor" and "vehicle" in metaphor, emphasizing that figurative language is not merely decorative but central to the construction of meaning. His psychological and cognitive perspective on language interpretation highlights the complexities of how readers engage with figurative expressions.

This paper examines the value of figurative language through multiple dimensions: its role in communication and meaning, its psychological and cognitive effects, its application in literary criticism and poetry analysis, and its function across different literary genres. Additionally, common misunderstandings in interpreting figurative language and strategies to improve comprehension will be discussed. The study also explores the evolution of figurative language in modern literature and its influence on contemporary literary theory.

By evaluating these aspects in light of I.A. Richards’ theories, this paper aims to illustrate how figurative language is a fundamental component of both literary aesthetics and cognitive processing, shaping not only artistic expression but also human understanding and perception.

The Value of Figurative Language

Figurative language is an essential aspect of human communication, serving as a bridge between abstract thought and concrete expression. I.A. Richards, a foundational figure in modern literary criticism, emphasized the significance of figurative language in his works, notably The Philosophy of Rhetoric (1936). His theories explore how language, especially metaphor, shapes human understanding and meaning-making processes.

Richards introduced the concepts of "tenor" and "vehicle" in metaphor analysis. The tenor represents the underlying subject, while the vehicle is the imagery or concept used to describe it. This interaction between the two components generates meaning beyond the literal interpretation, making figurative language indispensable for both literary and everyday communication. Richards viewed metaphor as a "transaction between contexts," highlighting its role in cognitive and communicative processes. 

One of the primary values of figurative language lies in its ability to convey complex ideas succinctly. Metaphors, similes, and analogies allow for the compression of vast concepts into digestible forms. For instance, Shakespeare’s metaphor "All the world’s a stage" (As You Like It) encapsulates human existence as a performative cycle, condensing profound philosophical thought into a single phrase. Richards argued that such expressions enable deeper cognitive connections, facilitating understanding across cultural and linguistic barriers. 

Furthermore, figurative language enhances emotional expression. Unlike literal language, which often limits expression to direct statements, figures of speech imbue language with nuance, connotation, and affective depth. In poetry and literature, this function is particularly significant. Poets like T.S. Eliot and W.B. Yeats rely on symbolic and metaphorical language to evoke emotions that direct description cannot achieve. Richards’ concept of "feedforward"—the anticipation of meaning based on context—illustrates how readers engage with figurative language by constructing interpretations based on prior knowledge and contextual cues. 

In addition to its aesthetic and communicative functions, figurative language plays a crucial role in critical interpretation. In Practical Criticism (1929), Richards examined how readers' responses to figurative expressions vary, demonstrating the subjective nature of meaning. He highlighted the dangers of misunderstanding and over-interpretation, stressing that figurative language requires a balance between personal interpretation and textual fidelity. This insight remains central to contemporary literary criticism, influencing approaches such as reader-response theory and deconstruction. 

Ultimately, the value of figurative language extends beyond literary aesthetics. It serves as a fundamental mechanism of thought, shaping perceptions, fostering creativity, and enabling nuanced discourse. As Richards’ work demonstrates, understanding figurative language is essential for both literary analysis and broader communicative competence, making it a cornerstone of intellectual inquiry.

The Role of Figurative Language in Communication and Meaning

Figurative language enriches communication by conveying complex ideas and emotions beyond literal interpretations. I.A. Richards, a pivotal figure in literary criticism, introduced the concepts of "tenor" and "vehicle" in metaphor analysis, where the tenor is the subject, and the vehicle is the imagery used to describe it. This interaction generates meaning beyond literal interpretation, making figurative language indispensable in both literary and everyday communication. 

Richards emphasized that metaphor is not merely decorative but fundamental to thought and communication. He described it as a "borrowing between and intercourse of thoughts, a transaction between contexts," highlighting its role in cognitive processes. 

Building upon Richards' insights, George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, in their seminal work Metaphors We Live By, argue that metaphor is a fundamental mechanism of mind, allowing us to use our physical and social experiences to understand more abstract concepts. They illustrate how everyday language is structured metaphorically, shaping our perception of reality. 

In summary, figurative language is integral to communication and meaning-making. It enables abstraction, enhances clarity, and influences perception, demonstrating its profound role in both everyday speech and literary discourse. Richards' work remains foundational in understanding this phenomenon, reinforcing the idea that language is not a passive medium but an active force in shaping thought and interaction.

Psychological and Cognitive Aspects of Figurative Language

Figurative language plays a crucial role in shaping human cognition, influencing how individuals process, store, and communicate information. I.A. Richards’ theories emphasize that metaphor and other figures of speech are not merely decorative elements of language but essential cognitive tools that help individuals make sense of the world. Modern cognitive linguistics builds upon Richards' insights, demonstrating that figurative language is embedded in human thought processes and perception rather than being confined to poetic or literary contexts.

• Cognitive Mechanisms of Figurative Language

At its core, figurative language enhances cognition by allowing abstract concepts to be understood through more tangible, familiar experiences. This is particularly evident in metaphors, which, according to Richards, facilitate meaning by establishing a relationship between the "tenor" (the subject being described) and the "vehicle" (the imagery or concept used for comparison). For example, in the expression "time is money," time is the tenor, and money is the vehicle. This mapping allows individuals to conceptualize time as a valuable resource that can be spent, wasted, or saved. Such metaphorical structuring of thought is not limited to literature but extends into everyday discourse, shaping how individuals perceive and engage with the world. Richards’ work in The Philosophy of Rhetoric (1936) explores this idea extensively, suggesting that figurative expressions function as essential bridges between language and thought.

Modern cognitive linguistics, particularly the work of George Lakoff and Mark Johnson in Metaphors We Live By (1980), expands on Richards' ideas, arguing that metaphor is a fundamental structure of cognition rather than just a literary device. They illustrate how many conceptual frameworks are metaphorically structured, such as the notion that "argument is war" (e.g., "He defended his position," "She attacked my argument"). This demonstrates that figurative language is not just a way of speaking but a way of thinking that permeates various aspects of life, including politics, education, and interpersonal relationships .

• Psychological Effects of Figurative Language

Beyond its cognitive function, figurative language plays a significant role in emotional expression and processing. It provides individuals with a means of articulating complex or abstract emotions that might be difficult to express literally. For example, describing grief as "a heavy burden" conveys the weight and difficulty of the experience in a way that direct statements cannot. Richards' concept of the interinanimation of words—the idea that words derive their meaning from the relationships they form with other words in context—supports this notion. Metaphors and other figures of speech allow for nuanced emotional communication, enabling deeper connections between individuals .

Additionally, figurative language enhances memory retention. Research in cognitive psychology has demonstrated that metaphorical expressions create vivid mental images, making information easier to recall. This is why advertising and educational materials often rely on figurative speech; metaphors and analogies make messages more engaging and memorable. Richards’ feedforward theory, which explains how individuals anticipate meaning based on prior knowledge, aligns with these findings. When individuals encounter figurative expressions, they actively construct meaning by integrating prior experiences, cultural knowledge, and contextual clues .

• Neurological Basis of Figurative Language Processing

Recent neurological studies have provided further insights into how figurative language is processed in the brain. Unlike literal language, which primarily engages the left hemisphere (associated with logical reasoning and syntax), figurative language activates multiple areas, including the right hemisphere, which is linked to creativity, emotional processing, and abstract thinking. Research using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shown that interpreting metaphors involves brain regions responsible for sensory and emotional associations, suggesting that figurative language is deeply embedded in human cognition .

This neurological complexity indicates that figurative language is not merely a linguistic phenomenon but a deeply ingrained cognitive function. It involves multiple layers of processing, requiring individuals to draw upon personal experiences, cultural knowledge, and abstract reasoning to interpret meaning. Richards' work anticipated these findings by emphasizing the interactive and context-dependent nature of language comprehension. His theories align with contemporary neuroscience, which supports the idea that figurative language engages broader cognitive and neural networks than previously assumed .

Figurative Language in Literary Criticism and Poetry Analysis

Figurative language serves as a cornerstone in literary criticism and poetry analysis, offering profound insights into a text's deeper meanings and emotional resonances. I.A. Richards, a pioneering figure in modern literary theory, emphasized the significance of figurative language in understanding and evaluating literary works. His theories have profoundly influenced how critics and scholars approach poetry and other forms of literature.

• I.A. Richards' Theoretical Contributions

In his seminal work, The Principles of Literary Criticism (1924), Richards proposed that the value of poetry lies in its ability to organize complex human experiences and emotions through language. He argued that figurative language, particularly metaphors, plays a crucial role in this process by enabling readers to perceive connections between disparate ideas and emotions. This perspective positions metaphors not merely as decorative elements but as fundamental to the cognitive and emotional impact of poetry. 

Richards further explored the function of figurative language in his analysis of poetic value, suggesting that the interplay of words in a poem creates a unique experience that transcends literal interpretation. This interaction, which he termed the "interinanimation of words," highlights how metaphors and other figures of speech contribute to the overall meaning and aesthetic experience of a poem. 

• Implications for Literary Criticism

Richards' insights have had lasting implications for literary criticism. By recognizing the centrality of figurative language in conveying complex meanings and emotions, critics are better equipped to analyze and interpret literary works beyond their surface-level content. This approach encourages a deeper engagement with the text, considering how metaphors, similes, and other figures of speech function to evoke responses and convey themes.

• Applications in Poetry Analysis

In poetry analysis, understanding the use of figurative language is essential for unpacking the layers of meaning within a poem. For instance, analyzing how a poet employs metaphors can reveal insights into their perception of the world and the emotions they seek to convey. Richards' framework allows readers to appreciate the nuanced ways in which poets use language to create rich, multifaceted experiences.

Common Misunderstandings in Interpreting Figurative Language

Interpreting figurative language poses challenges, leading to frequent misunderstandings. Key factors contributing to these challenges include:

• Literal Interpretation: Readers may misinterpret figurative expressions by taking them literally, missing the intended meaning. For example, interpreting "raining cats and dogs" as actual animals falling from the sky instead of heavy rain. 

• Cultural Differences: Figurative language often contains cultural references unfamiliar to those from different backgrounds, leading to misinterpretation. For instance, idioms like "kick the bucket" (meaning to die) may confuse non-native speakers. 

• Lack of Contextual Awareness: Without understanding the context, readers may struggle to grasp the figurative meaning. For example, the phrase "break the ice" means to initiate conversation, not literally breaking ice. 

Overemphasis on Terminology: Focusing too much on labeling figurative language types can hinder understanding of their purpose and effect within the text. 

Strategies for Effectively Interpreting Figurative Language

To enhance comprehension of figurative language, consider the following strategies:

• Provide Contextual Examples: Use literature, music, and media to illustrate figurative language in context, aiding students' understanding. 

• Use Visual Aids: Incorporate images, diagrams, or videos to represent figurative expressions, making abstract concepts more concrete. 

• Interactive Activities: Engage students with games, task cards, or group activities that involve identifying and creating figurative language. 

• Encourage Creative Writing: Have students incorporate figurative language into their writing, deepening their understanding through practical application. 

• Discuss Cultural Contexts: Explore the cultural origins of idioms and expressions to enhance appreciation and comprehension. 

• Utilize Technology: Employ digital tools and apps designed to teach figurative language, offering interactive learning experiences. 

By acknowledging common misunderstandings and implementing these strategies, educators and learners can improve their interpretation and appreciation of figurative language.

The Impact of Figurative Language on Reader Engagement and Comprehension

Figurative language, encompassing metaphors, similes, and idioms, plays a pivotal role in enhancing reader engagement and comprehension. By transcending literal meanings, these linguistic devices invite readers to explore deeper layers of interpretation, thereby enriching their reading experience.

• Enhancing Reader Engagement

Figurative language captivates readers by appealing to their senses and emotions, creating vivid imagery that brings narratives to life. For instance, metaphors and similes draw parallels between disparate concepts, fostering connections that resonate on a personal level. This imaginative engagement sustains interest and encourages readers to invest more deeply in the text. As noted by Harris (1995), such devices "bring texts to life, enhancing reader engagement and understanding." 

• Facilitating Comprehension

Beyond engagement, figurative language aids in comprehension by simplifying complex ideas through familiar comparisons. By linking abstract concepts to concrete images, readers can grasp nuanced meanings more readily. This cognitive bridging is particularly effective in conveying emotions and themes that might be challenging to articulate directly. Research indicates that "figurative language stimulates readers' imagination and encourages them to think critically about the underlying messages in the text," thereby enhancing overall understanding. 

• Cognitive and Emotional Resonance

The use of figurative language engages multiple cognitive processes, including memory, inference, and visualization. By activating these mental faculties, readers are more likely to retain information and develop a deeper emotional connection to the material. This dual engagement of cognition and emotion not only enriches the reading experience but also fosters empathy and insight into diverse perspectives.

The Evolution of Figurative Language in Modern Literature

The use of figurative language has undergone significant transformations in modern literature, reflecting broader cultural, technological, and philosophical shifts. From classical epics to contemporary narratives, the application and interpretation of metaphors, similes, and other figures of speech have evolved, mirroring changes in societal norms and artistic sensibilities.

• Historical Perspectives

In classical literature, extended similes and elaborate metaphors were prevalent, serving both decorative and explanatory functions. For example, Homer's epics often employed detailed similes that enriched the narrative by drawing parallels to familiar experiences. These literary devices not only embellished the text but also provided readers with a framework to understand complex characters and events.

• Transition to Modernism

With the advent of modernism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, there was a marked shift in the use of figurative language. Writers began to experiment with more abstract and fragmented forms, reflecting the complexities and uncertainties of the modern world. This period saw a move away from ornate descriptions toward more subtle and innovative uses of metaphor and symbolism. As highlighted by Frank (1945), modern literature "is moving in the direction of spatial form," indicating an evolution that bridges historical and contemporary literary practices. 

• Contemporary Usage

In contemporary literature, figurative language continues to evolve, adapting to new media and cultural contexts. The rise of digital literature and multimedia storytelling has expanded the possibilities for employing figurative expressions, allowing for interactive and immersive reader experiences. Moreover, contemporary authors often use figurative language to challenge traditional narratives and explore diverse identities, reflecting the pluralistic nature of modern society.

The Role of Figurative Language in Different Literary Genres

Figurative language, encompassing devices such as metaphors, similes, personification, and hyperbole, serves as a cornerstone in literature, enriching texts by adding depth, emotion, and vivid imagery. Its application varies across literary genres, each utilizing these devices to achieve distinct artistic and expressive goals.

1. Poetry

Poetry is renowned for its dense use of figurative language, which is integral to its expressive power. Poets employ various figures of speech to convey complex emotions and abstract concepts succinctly. For instance, metaphors and similes are frequently used to draw imaginative comparisons, creating vivid imagery that resonates with readers. Personification imbues inanimate objects with human qualities, adding emotional layers to the poem. These devices enable poets to express profound ideas and evoke sensory experiences within the constraints of verse. As noted in the Virtual Learning Academy's lesson on poetry, "The poet uses language, imagery, rhythm, rhyme, sound effects, and various figures of speech to convey his/her meaning".

2. Prose

In prose, which includes novels, short stories, and essays, figurative language enhances narrative by adding depth and color to descriptions and characterizations. Authors utilize metaphors and similes to create relatable imagery, making abstract or complex ideas more accessible to readers. Personification and hyperbole can add emotional intensity or highlight particular traits, enriching the storytelling experience. The strategic use of these devices allows prose writers to craft more engaging and immersive narratives. As discussed in the Internet Public Library's article on figurative language in literature, these devices "provide more drama to the story or to just make the text more interesting". 

3. Drama

In drama, figurative language is pivotal in developing characters and advancing plots. Playwrights incorporate metaphors, similes, and other figures of speech into dialogues to reveal characters' inner thoughts, emotions, and motivations. This use of figurative language adds layers of meaning to interactions and helps convey subtext, enriching the audience's understanding of the narrative. The Virtual Learning Academy's lesson on Elizabethan drama highlights that "Poetry is literature that is filled with beauty and imagination," suggesting that dramatic works often blend poetic elements to enhance their expressive power.

4. Speeches

Speeches often employ figurative language to persuade, inspire, or evoke emotional responses from the audience. Rhetorical devices such as metaphors, analogies, and parallelism are used to emphasize points and make arguments more compelling. By appealing to the audience's emotions and imagination, speakers can effectively convey their messages and leave a lasting impact. The use of figurative language in speeches is discussed in the Bartleby Writing Guide, which notes that such devices "serve a variety of purposes – describing complex emotions, providing evocative comparisons, eliciting an emotion".

Influence of Figurative Language on Modern Literary Theory

Figurative language, encompassing metaphors, similes, and other rhetorical devices, has profoundly influenced modern literary theory. Its study has led to significant developments in understanding textual meaning, interpretation, and the nature of language itself.

1. Metaphor and Rhetorical Analysis

The examination of metaphors has been central to rhetorical analysis within literary theory. Aristotle's classical view treated metaphor as an embellishment to language, adding charm and appeal to logical arguments. However, modern criticism has re-evaluated this perspective, recognizing metaphor's fundamental role in shaping thought and meaning. This shift underscores the importance of figurative language in constructing literary texts and influencing interpretation. 

2. Deconstruction and Figural Language

Deconstructive critics, notably Paul de Man, have explored the tension between rhetoric (figural language) and meaning. De Man's work highlights how literary texts often undermine their own assertions through the complexities of figurative language, revealing inherent instabilities in meaning. This approach has led to a deeper understanding of the indeterminate nature of texts and the limitations of definitive interpretation.

3. Linguistic Approaches to Literature

The intersection of linguistics and literary theory has broadened the analysis of figurative language. Contemporary approaches extend beyond traditional textual analysis to consider the cognitive and cultural dimensions of figurative expressions. This expansion reflects a more holistic understanding of how figurative language functions within literary works and its impact on readers. 

4. Performative Aspects of Literary Theory

The performative basis of modern literary theory examines how language acts, including figurative expressions, constitute meaning rather than merely conveying it. This perspective shifts the focus from static interpretation to the dynamic processes of meaning-making, emphasizing the role of figurative language in enacting literary effects.

Conclusion

The study of figurative language, particularly through the lens of I.A. Richards’ theories, underscores its immense value in literature, communication, and cognition. Richards’ insights into metaphor and meaning reveal that figurative expressions are not merely ornamental but serve as essential mechanisms for shaping thought and interpretation. His emphasis on the interaction between the “tenor” and “vehicle” in metaphor demonstrates how language constructs layered meanings that engage readers on both intellectual and emotional levels.

The psychological and cognitive dimensions of figurative language further illustrate its role in reader comprehension and engagement. Research indicates that metaphorical thinking enhances memory retention, conceptual understanding, and emotional resonance, reinforcing the idea that figurative language is a fundamental aspect of human cognition. In literary criticism and poetry analysis, figurative language provides a means to explore deeper meanings, thematic nuances, and stylistic innovations.

However, despite its significance, figurative language is often subject to misinterpretation. Ambiguity, cultural variations, and individual differences in cognitive processing can lead to misunderstandings. Addressing these challenges requires the development of strategies for effective interpretation, such as contextual analysis, close reading, and an awareness of historical and cultural influences on language use.

The evolution of figurative language in modern literature highlights its adaptability and continued relevance. From traditional poetic metaphors to contemporary digital and multimodal expressions, figurative language remains a powerful tool for artistic innovation and critical discourse. Moreover, its influence on modern literary theory, particularly in deconstruction, cognitive poetics, and rhetorical analysis, underscores its central role in shaping the field of literary studies.

In conclusion, figurative language is not only a cornerstone of literature but also a fundamental aspect of human cognition and communication. I.A. Richards’ contributions provide a crucial theoretical framework for understanding its significance, emphasizing the intricate relationship between language, thought, and interpretation. As literature and communication continue to evolve, the study of figurative language remains vital for appreciating the complexities of meaning-making in both artistic and everyday discourse.

References 

Bilsky, Manuel. “I. A. Richards’ Theory of Metaphor.” Modern Philology, vol. 50, no. 2, 1952, pp. 130–37. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/435560 . 

Blankenship, Jane. “I. A. Richards’ ‘Context’ Theorem of Meaning.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 2, 1988, pp. 153–58. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3885867 . 

Cohn, Jan. “The Theory of Poetic Value in I. A. Richards’ ‘Principles of Literary Criticism’ and Shelley’s ‘A Defence of Poetry.’” Keats-Shelley Journal, vol. 21/22, 1972, pp. 95–111. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30212743 . 

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press, https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo3637992.html.

Lundin, Roger. “Metaphor in the Modern Critical Arena.” Christianity and Literature, vol. 33, no. 1, 1983, pp. 19–35. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44311235 . 

Nordquist, Richard. “The Tenor of a Metaphor, a Rhetorical Term.” ThoughtCo, 27 July 2018, https://www.thoughtco.com/tenor-metaphors-1692531 . 

Palmer, Barbara C., and Mary Alice Brooks. “Reading Until the Cows Come Home: Figurative Language and Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, vol. 47, no. 5, 2004, pp. 370–79. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40017523 . 

Palmer, Barbara C., et al. “Bridging Two Worlds: Reading Comprehension, Figurative Language Instruction, and the English-Language Learner.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, vol. 50, no. 4, 2006, pp. 258–67. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40013744. 

Święch, Paulina. “The Cognitive Aspect of Figurative Language.” Academia.edu, 2021, https://www.academia.edu/70142020/THE_COGNITIVE_ASPECT_OF_FIGURATIVE_LANGUAGE . 

Sutton, Walter. “The Literary Image and the Reader: A Consideration of the Theory of Spatial Form.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 16, no. 1, 1957, pp. 112–23. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/427132 . 

Words : 4396

Images : 5