Sunday, January 11, 2026

Gun Island : Lab Activity

This blog has been assigned by Prof .Dr. Dilip Barad as part of the  Lab Activity on Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh








Infographic : 


Slide Deck : 





Blog : 

Unraveling Amitav Ghosh's "Gun Island": A World of Myth, Migration, and Climate Crisis
Amitav Ghosh's "Gun Island" is a novel that masterfully weaves together ancient folklore, contemporary global crises, and profound environmental concerns into a single, intricate narrative. It is a story where the boundaries between the rational and the surreal blur, reflecting a world grappling with changes that defy conventional understanding. The narrative follows Dinanath Datta, a US-based rare-book dealer whose quiet, rational world is upended when he is drawn into the enigmatic myth of the Gun Merchant (Bonduki Sadagar) and the formidable serpent goddess, Mansa Devi. This journey pulls him from the sinking Sundarbans of Bengal to the sinking city of Venice and the wildfire-plagued landscapes of Los Angeles, connecting seemingly disparate locations and crises. This analysis will explore the novel's key characters, plot events, and central themes to illuminate how Ghosh constructs a resonant and urgent story for our disoriented times.

1. The Cast of Characters: A Global Network

The novel is populated by a diverse cast of characters whose lives intersect across continents, linking the ancient past with the turbulent present.

1. The Core Triangle:

    ◦ Dinanath Datta (Deen/Dino): The protagonist and narrator, Deen is a rational-minded, US-based rare-book dealer and folklore expert. His journey to unravel a myth forces him to confront the limits of his own worldview.

    ◦ Chinta: A historian and Deen's friend based in Venice, she acts as a believer and interpreter of the uncanny and historical mysteries. Chinta consistently challenges Deen's rationalism, offering mystical and historical explanations for the strange events they encounter.

    ◦ Piali Roy (Pia): A marine biologist, Pia represents a purely rational, scientific worldview. She consistently provides logical explanations rooted in climate change and biology for the strange phenomena the characters face.

2. The Migrants and Locals:

    ◦ Tipu: An ambitious young man from the Sundarbans, he experiences supernatural events after a cobra bite, which propels him on a perilous journey of illegal migration to Europe.

    ◦ Rafi: Tipu's loyal friend and the custodian of the Mansa Devi shrine, Rafi also migrates to Venice and becomes a key source of information for Deen.

    ◦ Nilima Bose: The respected founder of a charitable trust in the Sundarbans, she is a credible and influential figure who first recounts the legend of the Gun Merchant to Deen.

    ◦ Lubna Kala: A Bangladeshi migrant in Venice who provides a hub for the migrant community, she helps others navigate their new lives and organizes aid.

    ◦ Bilal and Kabir: Their story of migration runs parallel to Tipu and Rafi's journey, tragically highlighting the immense dangers of human trafficking.

3. The Mythical Figures:

    ◦ The Gun Merchant (Bonduki Sadagar): The central figure of the 17th-century legend who fled the wrath of a goddess. His story is reinterpreted throughout the novel as a coded history of migration and climate crisis.

    ◦ Mansa Devi: The Bengali goddess of serpents, whose myth drives the initial plot and whose presence is felt in the uncanny events that unfold.

2. The Unfolding Narrative: A Journey Across Sinking Lands

1. The Sundarbans: The Myth Begins The plot is set in motion when Dinanath, visiting his native Kolkata, is told the story of the Gun Merchant by Nilima Bose. Ghosh immediately establishes the Sundarbans as one of the novel’s key "sinking sites," a landscape under existential threat and a fitting twin to the sinking city of Venice. Deen reluctantly visits the merchant's crumbling shrine, where he meets its young custodian, Rafi, and discovers three cryptic symbols: the Hebrew letter 'aleph', a symbol of an island-within-an-island, and a spider.

2. America: The Uncanny Goes Global Deen's journey takes him to an academic conference in Los Angeles, a city besieged by massive wildfires. The uncanny follows him; on his flight, he witnesses what appear to be snakes in the sky, and his phone inexplicably plays a song that leads to him being questioned by authorities. Ghosh uses this section to highlight the intellectual crisis of the West, exemplified by the story of Lisa, an entomologist trolled and disbelieved after warning of the fires' inevitability. As one character notes of her treatment: "It's like we are back in the Dark Ages, women being attacked as witches."

3. Venice: A Sinking Twin The narrative shifts to Venice, a city Ghosh frames as a "portal in time" alongside Varanasi, deeply aware of its own mortality. This technique collapses geographical and temporal boundaries, reinforcing the theme of global interconnectedness. Here, Deen is shocked to find Rafi and is introduced to a thriving community of Bangladeshi migrants. The uncanny events persist with encounters with a venomous spider and invasive shipworms threatening the city's foundations, which Pia attributes to the northward migration of species caused by global warming.

4. The Blue Boat: The Refugee Crisis The novel's disparate threads converge around the "Blue Boat," a vessel carrying refugees, including Tipu, stranded in the Mediterranean. When authorities refuse to let it dock, a humanitarian crisis unfolds. In a climactic sequence, Lubna Kala organizes a rescue mission, uniting the main characters—Deen, Pia, Chinta, and Rafi—for a common cause, bringing the novel's themes of migration, climate change, and human connection to a powerful head.

3. Core Themes: Decoding "Gun Island"

1. Climate Change and The Great Derangement "Gun Island" is Amitav Ghosh's artistic answer to the intellectual challenge he lays out in his non-fiction work, The Great Derangement. Ghosh’s central argument is that the climate crisis produces events so surreal and unsettling that they defy the conventions of literary realism. The novel’s embrace of the "uncanny" is therefore not a stylistic choice, but a narrative strategy designed to represent a reality that has itself become unbelievable.

    ◦ Sinking Sites: Both the Sundarbans and Venice are portrayed as coastal areas existentially threatened by rising sea levels.

    ◦ Wildfires: The devastating wildfires in Los Angeles are depicted as an apocalyptic event, a direct consequence of a changing climate.

    ◦ Species Migration: The northward movement of venomous brown recluse spiders and snakes into new territories is a direct result of global warming.

    ◦ Invasive Species: The threat of shipworms, which thrive in warmer waters, to the wooden foundations of Venice illustrates the cascading ecological impacts of climate change.

    ◦ Extreme Weather: An unseasonal and violent hailstorm in Venice underscores the increasing unpredictability and severity of weather events.

2. Migration and Human Trafficking Ghosh confronts the modern refugee crisis by deliberately paralleling the perilous journeys of Tipu, Rafi, Bilal, and Kabir with the historical slave trade. Their migration is driven by a complex mix of climate disasters, poverty, and socio-economic desires. Ghosh’s argument is one of historical recurrence: he frames modern human trafficking as a direct continuation of the same brutal, exploitative forces that ensnared the original Gun Merchant, suggesting this form of exploitation is a recurring pattern in human history.

3. Etymology: The Secret History of Words The novel demonstrates a profound interest in etymology, using the origins of words as a tool to uncover lost histories and hidden connections. This "etymological mystery" reveals that what is lost in translation can obscure historical reality.

Word/Phrase
Conventional Meaning
Uncovered Meaning in the Novel
Bonduki Sadagar
Gun Merchant
The merchant from Venice (Al-Bunduqiyyah)
Bhut
Ghost / Evil Spirit
A being or presence (from Sanskrit root bhu, "to be"), linking the past to the present.
Possession
Takeover by a demon
An "awakening" to a new reality or understanding.

4. Historification of Myth Ghosh’s primary literary strategy in the novel is the "historification" of myth—the argument that the legend of the Gun Merchant is not a supernatural folktale but a coded historical record. The narrative reveals that the myth documents real events from the 17th century, a period marked by the "Little Ice Age," a direct historical parallel to today's climate crisis. By framing the myth this way, Ghosh argues that our current crises of climate, plague, and migration are not unprecedented. Rather, they are part of a recurring historical pattern that cultures have always recorded and processed through myths, which preserve the memory of uncanny traumas for future generations.

5. Critique of Eurocentric Humanism Ghosh dismantles the Western, rationalist worldview through the character dynamics of Pia (the pure rationalist), Chinta (the believer), and Deen (caught between them). The novel challenges the eurocentric hierarchy that places scientific reason above all other forms of knowledge. This is powerfully illustrated when Deen, the American-educated expert, cannot decipher the shrine's symbols and must rely on the uneducated Rafi for their interpretation. This moment ruptures "hierarchical knowledge systems," suggesting that all forms of knowing are necessary. Furthermore, by redefining "possession" not as demonic takeover but as an "awakening" to a new reality, Ghosh validates non-Western ways of knowing that the Enlightenment tradition might pathologize as primitive or irrational.

Conclusion: A World Interconnected

Through its intricate plot, globe-spanning journey, and richly drawn characters, Amitav Ghosh's "Gun Island" connects the seemingly separate crises of climate change, mass migration, and historical trauma into a single, urgent narrative. The novel's final message is a powerful one for our time: in an era of planetary crisis, all people and all places are fundamentally interconnected. The old divisions that have structured our world—between the rational and the uncanny, the human and the non-human, the past and the present—are collapsing, forcing us to recognize that we share a single, collective destiny.

Research Topic : Climate Fiction as Climate Warning: Gun Island and the Reality of Ecological Collapse










1.Create a table showing each source with its publication date, author credentials, and whether it's primary source, secondary analysis or opinion piece.

Source Title

Publication Date

Author Credentials

Source Type

"Gun Island" and "The Great Derangement" by Amitav Ghosh: Summary & Analysis

April 15, 2021

Forrest Brown, climate writer and creator of the Stories for Earth podcast.

Secondary Analysis (Summarizes and analyzes existing literary works),.

"'Gun Island' Is a Surreal Novel About Climate Change and Migration"

September 10, 2019

JR Ramakrishnan, writer for Electric Literature.

Primary Source (Interview with the author Amitav Ghosh providing direct quotes),.

"Analysing Amitav Ghosh's Gun Island as a Climate Fiction"

October 30, 2024

Iftakhar Ahmed, Department of English at Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University.

Secondary Analysis (Peer-reviewed scholarly research article),.

"Beyond Multiculturalism: Amitav Ghosh's Gun Island and Transnational Journeys"

August 2025

Dr. Sourav Kumar Nag, Assistant Professor of English at Bankura University.

Secondary Analysis (Academic journal article examining multicultural themes),.

"Climate Fiction as Climate Warning: Gun Island and the Reality of Ecological Collapse"

Circa 2024-2025,

Not explicitly named in excerpt, but written as a critical intervention in the genre.

Secondary Analysis (Synthesizes folklore, history, and scientific data).

"Climate change as a threatening factor in Ghosh's Gun Island"

June 17, 2023

Dr. Aareena Nazneen, Assistant Professor at Integral University.

Secondary Analysis (Peer-reviewed research paper exploring ecocriticism),.

"Exploring Environmental Degradation and Climate Change in Amitav Ghosh's Gun Island"

October 31, 2024

Dr. Deep Shikha Karthik, Assistant Professor of English at F.A.A Govt. P. G. College Mahmudabad.

Secondary Analysis (Article analyzing Ghosh’s narrative craft and themes),.

"Gun Island" (Novel Excerpt)

June 2019 (Excerpt copyright)

Amitav Ghosh, author of nonfiction and eight novels, awarded the Padma Shri.

Primary Source (Direct excerpt from the literary work of fiction),.

"Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh" (Blog Post)

October 14, 2024

Aishwariya Laxmi, author/blogger; reviewed by K.S. Loganathan,.

Opinion Piece (A critical book review shared on a literary blog).

"Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh review – climate and culture in crisis"

June 5, 2019

Alex Clark, journalist and literary reviewer for The Guardian.

Opinion Piece (Professional book review analyzing literary style),.

"Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh" (World Literature Today)

Autumn 2019

Rita Joshi, Lady Shri Ram College for Women at Delhi University.

Opinion Piece (Scholarly book review for a literary publication).

"Humans and Nonhumans in Amitav Ghosh's Gun Island"

January 5, 2024

Eva-Karin Elisabeth Berlingieri, Mid Sweden University student,.

Secondary Analysis (Ecocritical thesis/Independent research project),.

"Nonhuman and the Anthropocene: An Analysis of Amitav Ghosh's Recent Select Works"

March 31, 2024

Ramesh Fayez, Research Scholar at Aligarh Muslim University,.

Secondary Analysis (Peer-reviewed academic analysis using ecocritical theory).

"Myth as Epistemology and Historical Memory in Amitav Ghosh's Gun Island"

August 5, 2025

Mrs. D.G. Kalaivani, Ph.D. Research Scholar and Assistant Professor.

Secondary Analysis (Comparative literary analysis published in a journal).

"Role of Literature in Addressing the Climate Crisis in Amitav Ghosh Novel the Gun Island"

Jan-June 2024

Astha Khandelwal (Scholar) and Dr. Deepika Dhand (Supervisor) at Mats University.

Secondary Analysis (Eco-critical journal article).

"Reclaiming the Unreal: Myth, Non-Human Agency, and Literary Imagination"

August 15, 2025

Zakiyah Tasnim, Department of English at the University of Chittagong.

Secondary Analysis (Literary-analytical research article).

"Review: 'Gun Island' Is Amitav Ghosh's Most Tender Book Yet"

July 6, 2019

Shreya Ila Anasuya, writer and managing editor for Point of View,.

Opinion Piece (Tender analysis and review of the novel's themes),.

"The Earth System Reanimated: The 'Environmental Uncanny' in Ghosh's Novel"

August 19, 2024

Thomas Schwarz, scholar contributing to Writing the Anthropocene,.

Secondary Analysis (Scholarly essay exploring biopolitical consequences),.

"The Synergy of History and Ecology in Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island"

October 31, 2024,

Kalaivani D G, Assistant Professor at Vivekanandha College of Engineering for Women.

Secondary Analysis (Article articulating a framework of planetary environmentalism).




2. Which of these sources are most frequently cited or referenced by other sources in this notebook? 

The Most Frequently Cited Primary Critical Framework

• The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable (2016) by Amitav Ghosh is the most frequently cited work in the entire collection.

• Virtually every secondary analysis uses this book as its foundational framework, citing Ghosh's arguments about the "structural failures of realism" and the "environmental uncanny" to analyze his novel Gun Island.

• It is treated as the theoretical benchmark for why contemporary literature has historically failed to address the climate crisis.

The Most Cited Secondary Analyses and Reviews
Beyond Ghosh’s own writing, several specific secondary sources are referenced multiple times across different papers:

• Alex Clark’s Review in The Guardian: This piece is cited by several scholarly works, including "Climate Fiction as Climate Warning," Dr. Deep Shikha Karthik’s article, and Zakiyah Tasnim’s research. Clark is frequently credited for the observation that Ghosh responds to the climate crisis by dispensing with realist conventions in favor of a "shaggy dog story" that leads to reality.

• JR Ramakrishnan’s Interview in Electric Literature: This interview is utilized by researchers to provide primary-source evidence of Ghosh's personal experiences with "uncanny" weather and his stance on the "racial coding" of global travel.

• Iftakhar Ahmed’s "Analysing Amitav Ghosh's Gun Island as a Climate Fiction": Published in the MBSTU Journal of Science and Technology, this paper is cited by both the comprehensive "Climate Fiction as Climate Warning" synthesis and Kalaivani D G’s article on the synergy of history and ecology.

• Rita Joshi’s Review in World Literature Today: This source is referenced for its insights into the cross-cultural patterns of Ghosh’s work and the etymology of the "Gun Merchant" name.

The "Synthesizer" Source

• "Climate Fiction as Climate Warning: Gun Island and the Reality of Ecological Collapse" stands out as the most interconnected source in the notebook.

• This document functions as a nexus, explicitly listing and synthesizing almost every other academic paper and blog post in the notebook—including works by Tasnim, Berlingieri, Fayez, Schwarz, and Khandelwal—into its own 64-item bibliography.

3. Summarize the primary perspective of the top five most substantial sources 

The five most substantial sources in the notebook provide a multifaceted evaluation of Gun Island, emphasizing that the climate crisis is not merely a scientific issue but a profound failure of the human imagination and cultural storytelling.

1. Climate Fiction as Climate Warning

This comprehensive synthesis argues that ecological collapse is a crisis of culture, history, and storytelling. It posits that the modern realist novel is structurally unable to represent the "freakish" and "catastrophic" events of the Anthropocene because it treats nature as a passive backdrop. By blending scientific data—such as the accelerating sea level rise in the Sundarbans and "dead zones" in the Mediterranean—with folklore, the source presents a "planetary environmentalism" that recognizes the agency of all living things. The primary perspective is that deliverance lies in reclaiming myth as an ecological archive to heal our "great derangement".

2. Humans and Nonhumans in Amitav Ghosh's Gun Island

Through an ecocritical lens, this source focuses on the interdependent relationship between nature and humanity, asserting that nature is a conscious participant that reacts to human interference. It highlights how climate change-induced phenomena force both humans and animals, such as Irrawaddy dolphins and yellow-bellied sea snakes, to abandon their homes in a "multispecies migration". The perspective emphasizes that the distinction between "nature" and "culture" is no longer valid in the Anthropocene, as human actions have become a geological force that has permanently altered the planet’s balance.

3. The Synergy of History and Ecology in Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island

This article advances a framework of planetary environmentalism, arguing that contemporary ecological devastation is inseparable from the legacies of colonialism and capitalist exploitation. It frames the Sundarbans and climate refugees as emblematic of "slow violence"—the gradual, invisible destruction wrought by imperial histories that re-emerge as environmental precarity. The primary perspective is that history is ecological and ecology is historical; thus, we cannot reckon with climate change without addressing the colonial roots of displacement and the "epistemic violence" of modernity.

4. "Gun Island" and "The Great Derangement" Summary & Analysis

This source uses Ghosh’s nonfiction as a critical framework to argue that modernist, realist fiction is "deranged" because it rationalizes the universe into a world of few surprises. It highlights the novel's commentary on how the carbon economy and colonialism have upended the demographic profile of the planet, creating a global refugee crisis. The perspective concludes that stories must challenge the delusion that humans are "above nature," suggesting that deliverance lies not in the future but in a "mystery beyond memory" found in the past.

5. Electric Literature Interview: JR Ramakrishnan and Amitav Ghosh

In this primary source, Ghosh provides direct insight into his intent, asserting that the novel is not "climate fiction" but a reflection of a reality where fact is outrunning fiction. He emphasizes the "national and racial coding" of global travel, noting the stark contrast between those who move freely and refugees who must rely on "migrant magic carpets" like cheap smartphones and traffickers. His perspective is that while stories may not change the world, they help us inhabit a predicament and discover deeper human meaning—such as faith and joy—within hard circumstances.

4. Identify 'Research Gap' for further research in this area.

The sources identify several critical "research gaps" that suggest directions for further inquiry into climate fiction, postcolonial studies, and environmental science.

1. Empirical Impact on Human Behavior

While many sources argue that literature can raise awareness and inspire action, there is a noted need for interdisciplinary research to prove this effect. Specifically, researchers suggest that collaboration between environmental scientists, sociologists, and psychologists is needed to determine exactly how reading climate fiction like Gun Island alters environmental attitudes and behaviors in the real world.

2. Cultural Literacy and Mythic Analysis

A significant gap exists in the scholarship regarding the cultural and mythic specificities used by Ghosh. One source notes that most existing research focuses heavily on environmental concerns because many scholars are unfamiliar with the Manasa myth and other regional folklore. There is an opportunity for further research to bridge the gap between "the great derangement" of the environment and the specific cultural/mythical archives that offer survival manuals for ecological upheaval.

3. Legal and Policy Gaps for Climate Refugees

The sources highlight a glaring disconnect between the reality of displacement and international law. "Ecological migrants" are frequently depicted in the sources as people fleeing land that has turned salty or been blown to pieces, yet they have no legal status or protection under the 1951 Refugee Convention. Further research could explore the legal and political frameworks needed to recognize climate-induced migration as a valid reason for asylum.

4. Real-World Ecological Impacts of Mitigation Systems

While technical solutions like Italy's MOSE system are designed to protect cities like Venice from rising sea levels, their long-term effects are under-researched. Sources suggest a need for scientific inquiry into the negative ecological consequences of such systems, such as depleted oxygen levels in lagoons and increased water residence time, which may create "dead zones".

5. Reimagining Literary Criticism for the "Unreal"

There is a gap in traditional literary criticism, which often struggles to categorize works that blend realism with the supernatural. Critics have historically dismissed the "unreal" elements of Ghosh’s work as confusing or not serious. There is a need for a new critical grammar that moves beyond Eurocentric, realist constraints to value mythic and spiritual experiences as legitimate modes of ecological knowledge.

5. Draft a Literature Review ending with hypotheses and research questions pertaining to this research gap.
 
Literature Review: Myth, Agency, and the Great Derangement in Amitav Ghosh’s Gun Island

The Crisis of Realism and the "Great Derangement"
Contemporary scholarly discourse identifies a profound "cultural inability" to grasp the scale and urgency of planetary environmental transformations, a phenomenon Amitav Ghosh terms the "great derangement". The foundational argument in the sources is that the modern realist novel, which emerged alongside the carbon economy, is structurally ill-equipped to represent the climate emergency because it treats nature as a passive, predictable backdrop for human drama. By focusing on individual interiority and "probability," realism excludes the "freakish" and "catastrophic" events—such as once-in-a-century storms—that define the Anthropocene. Ghosh’s response in Gun Island is to dispense with realist conventions, utilizing uncanny coincidences and supernatural visitations to capture the "grotesque" nature of the planetary crisis.

Myth as an Ecological and Historical Archive

A significant portion of the literature explores Ghosh’s reclamation of myth as an "epistemological tool" rather than mere superstition. The legend of the Gun Merchant (Bonduki Sadagar) serves as a trans-historical archive, encoding the trauma of the Little Ice Age and linking 17th-century climate disruption to the contemporary crisis. Scholars argue that by reanimating the myth of Manasa Devi, Ghosh creates a "survival manual" that preserves ecological knowledge often erased by official historiography. This narrative strategy allows for a "planetary environmentalism" that bridges the temporal divide between colonial maritime trade and modern carbon-intensive economies.

Multispecies Migration and Non-Human Agency

The sources highlight a shift toward "post-anthropocentric" storytelling, where nature is no longer a setting but an active historical agent. Gun Island portrays a "multispecies migration," showing that animals like Irrawaddy dolphins and yellow-bellied sea snakes are displaced by the same climatic forces affecting humans. This "environmental uncanny" acknowledges that non-human forces possess their own purposes, challenging the Enlightenment view that only humans possess awareness and consciousness. The novel suggests that the current "possession" of the world by machine-like systems has rendered even the powerful powerless, necessitating a re-evaluation of the human-nature relationship.

Colonialism and the Biopolitics of Displacement

Finally, the literature emphasizes the "national and racial coding" of global travel and its roots in colonial history. The "Blue Boat" of refugees in the Mediterranean is framed as the "upending of a centuries-old project" of European imperial remaking, where the consequences of historical exploitation are now arriving at Europe’s metropolitan centers. The Sundarbans and Venice are treated as mirrored nodes of risk, where ecological collapse is inseparable from the "slow violence" of colonial extraction and capitalist growth. Deliverance, the sources suggest, lies not in future technological fixes but in a "mystery beyond memory" found in the past.

Research Questions

1. Narrative Efficacy: Does the integration of mythic-ecological archives and the "environmental uncanny" in fiction lead to a statistically significant increase in a reader's "political efficacy" and "planetary consciousness" compared to standard realist climate narratives?

2. Cross-Cultural Literacy: How does a reader’s unfamiliarity with regional folklore (such as the Manasa myth) influence their perception of the "credibility" and urgency of climate warnings delivered through supernatural plot devices?

3. Legal Imagination: To what extent can literature that links colonial displacement with contemporary migration shift public opinion toward granting legal status to "ecological migrants" currently excluded from the 1951 Refugee Convention?

4. Technocratic vs. Ecological Paradox: What are the actual long-term ecological consequences of large-scale technocratic mitigation systems, such as Venice’s MOSE, on the biodiversity of "liminal ecologies" like lagoons and deltas?

5. Multispecies Agency: How does the literary granting of historical agency to non-humans (animals, storms, and viruses) alter the ethical framework through which readers perceive human responsibility in the Anthropocene?

Hypotheses

• H1: (Psychological Impact) Readers of "mythic realist" climate fiction will report a higher sense of interspecies empathy and a greater intent to engage in collective action than readers of traditional realist narratives that focus solely on human psychology.

• H2: (Agency and Ethics) The re-enchantment of nature through mythic storytelling decreases anthropocentric bias more effectively than scientific data by forcing readers to recognize the Earth as an active, purposeful historical participant.

• H3: (Historical Resonance) Exposure to narratives highlighting the trans-historical continuities between 17th-century climate disruption (the Little Ice Age) and modern crises significantly increases a reader's emotional resonance with the plight of climate refugees.

• H4: (The Uncanny Effect) The use of uncanny coincidences in narrative structure increases a reader’s belief in a responsive Earth system more effectively than linear cause-and-effect plots, which often treat nature as a passive backdrop.

• H5: (Linguistic/Semantic Barriers) Bridging the semantic divide between "superstition" and "ecological knowledge" in literature will reveal hidden "survival manuals" that enhance community resilience in the face of environmental collapse

Thank You!

Homebound (2025) Movie

Homebound

Theatrical release poster

Directed by

Neeraj Ghaywan

Screenplay by

Neeraj Ghaywan

Sumit Roy (co-authors)

Dialogues by

Neeraj Ghaywan

Varun Grover

Shreedhar Dubey

Story by

Basharat Peer

Neeraj Ghaywan

Sumit Roy

Based on

A Friendship, a Pandemic and a Death Beside the Highway

by Basharat Peer

Produced by

Starring

Cinematography

Pratik Shah

Edited by

Nitin Baid

Music by

Score:

Naren Chandravarkar

Benedict Taylor

Songs:

Amit Trivedi

Production

company

Dharma Productions

Distributed by

Dharma Productions

Release dates

  • 21 May 2025 (Cannes)

  • 26 September 2025 (India)

Running time

122 minutes

Country

India

Language

Hindi

Box office

est. ₹3 crore




 Part I: Pre-screening context & adaptation

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh - Flipped Learning Activity

This blog has been assigned by Prof .Dr. Dilip Barad as part of the Flipped Learning Activity on Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh. The purpose of this activity is to promote an in-depth engagement with the novel through video lessons, worksheets, and reflective blog writing. It aims to strengthen analytical ability, critical thinking, and creative interpretation of the novel’s themes and narrative techniques.

For the background reading Click Here

Step 1: Watch the Video Lessons 

Characters and Summary 








Thematic Study  

 Video 1: Etymological Mystery | Title of the Novel | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh









Video 3: Part II | Historification of Myth and Mythification of History | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh
















Step 2: Complete the Worksheets 

'Gun Island' Worksheet - 1



'Gun Island' Worksheet - 2

Reference

Barad, Dilip. “Gun Island.” Gun Island, 23 Jan. 2022, blog.dilipbarad.com/2022/01/gun-island.html

Barad, Dilip. “Flipped Learning Activity Instructions: Gun Island by Amitav Ghosh.” ResearchGate, Jan. 2025, www.researchgate.net/publication/388143893_Flipped_Learning_Activity_Instructions_Gun_Island_by_Amitav_Ghosh.

DoE-MKBU. “Characters and Summary - 1 | Sundarbans | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 17 Jan. 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn70pnUIK1Y.

DoE-MKBU. “Characters and Summary - 2 | USA | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 17 Jan. 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiYLTn7cWm8.

DoE-MKBU. “Climate Change | the Great Derangement | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 21 Jan. 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_3tD4voebA.

DoE-MKBU. “Etymological Mystery | Title of the Novel | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 19 Jan. 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Yg5RmjBlTk.

DoE-MKBU. “Migration | Human Trafficking | Refugee Crisis | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 21 Jan. 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLeskjjZRzI.

DoE-MKBU. “Part I - Historification of Myth and Mythification of History | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 21 Jan. 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBLsFEKLGd0.

DoE-MKBU. “Part II | Historification of Myth and Mythification of History | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 23 Jan. 2023, www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP2HerbJ5-g.

DoE-MKBU. “Part III - Historification of Myth and Mythification of History | Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 23 Jan. 2023, www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVLqxT_mUCg.

DoE-MKBU. “Summary - 3 | Venice | Part 2 of Gun Island | Amitav Ghosh.” YouTube, 18 Jan. 2022, www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F3n_rrRG9M.

Ghosh, Amitav. Gun Island: A Novel. 2019.




Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Cyber Bullying: Impact and Prevention

Cyber Awareness & Digital Citizenship Hackathon (December 2025)


#cyberclub_mkbu

#cawach

#cyberclubmkbu


The Cyber Awareness & Digital Citizenship Hackathon (Dec 2025) was a mission-mode, lab-based academic event organised by the Cyber Club and Digital India Cell, MKBU, under the Cybersecurity AWareness And Creative Handholding - Cawach Kendra initiative, with support from KCG, Government of Gujarat. The event was held on 31 December 2025 at Department of English - Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University.


The hackathon focused on the creation of AI-assisted digital awareness content related to cyber safety, ethical digital behaviour, and responsible digital participation. Participants researched real-world cyber issues, used Generative AI responsibly, and produced awareness materials such as infographics, videos, podcasts, posters, blogs, websites, and social media campaigns.


With 30 curated themes covering cyber security, cyber frauds, digital citizenship, mental well-being, and cyber laws, the hackathon aimed to transform students into informed digital ambassadors. The final outcome consisted of ready-to-deploy cyber awareness resources for campus, community, and online dissemination, aligned with the mission:


“Create Awareness • Prevent Harm • Empower Digital Citizens.”


As part of the Cyber Awareness & Digital Citizenship Hackathon (Dec 2025), I worked on the theme “Cyber Bullying: Impact and Prevention.”


With the support of Notebook LM, I created a short awareness video, infographics, and a research-informed blog focusing on the psychological, social, and academic impact of cyberbullying, along with practical prevention strategies and responsible digital behaviour.


The content was designed to be citizen-centric, evidence-based, and easily accessible, aiming to promote cyber safety, empathy, and ethical digital participation.


Blog :

Beyond Mean Tweets: 7 Scientific Truths That Change Everything You Know About Cyberbullying


Introduction

The term "cyberbullying" conjures images of a pervasive, modern-day scourge—a digital Wild West where cruelty runs rampant. We generally perceive it as a straightforward problem of meanness amplified by technology. While the harm is undeniable, the reality of cyberbullying—its psychological drivers, its unique social dynamics, and the specific ways digital platforms shape it—is far more complex and surprising than most people realize.

Beneath the surface of hurtful comments and malicious posts lies a web of counter-intuitive psychological phenomena. The motivations of perpetrators are often darker than simple spite, the behavior of witnesses is shaped by subtle digital cues, and the very architecture of the internet creates unexpected consequences for both victims and aggressors.

This article delves into the research to reveal seven of the most impactful and surprising truths about cyberbullying. By understanding what the data actually tells us, we can move beyond common assumptions and begin to grasp the true nature of cruelty in the digital age.


1.It’s Not Just Meanness- It’s Often The Enjoyment of Cruelty For many perpetrators, the cruelty is the point.

Psychologists often associate aggressive online behaviors with the "Dark Tetrad" of personality traits: narcissism (entitled self-importance), Machiavellianism (manipulativeness), psychopathy (lack of empathy), and sadism (the enjoyment of cruelty). Research sought to understand which of these traits was the most powerful predictor of cyberbullying. The finding was startling: when controlling for the overlap between these traits, everyday sadism emerged as the most significant predictor. This suggests that for a significant number of cyberbullies, the goal isn't just to be mean or to assert dominance, but to derive genuine pleasure from the suffering of others.

Researchers also explored a related concept called moral disengagement—the psychological process of convincing yourself that your harmful actions are justified. The hypothesis was that individuals with dark traits would need to engage in this mental gymnastics to feel okay about their behavior. Surprisingly, the study found that moral disengagement was not a necessary mechanism. For some perpetrators, particularly those high in sadism, their actions may be so aligned with their desires that they feel no internal moral conflict that needs to be rationalized away. This is a profound challenge for intervention strategies; if there's no moral conflict to begin with, then appeals to empathy or 'doing the right thing' are likely to be completely ineffective for this cohort of perpetrators.

2. Today’s Victims Are Tomorrow’s Bullies

Online cruelty creates a vicious feedback loop.

One of the most tragic findings in cyberbullying research is the prevalence of the victim-offender cycle. Studies show that individuals who experience cybervictimization are at a significantly higher risk of becoming cyberbullies themselves. Research reveals a crucial nuance: this cycle is particularly potent for individuals with higher levels of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism. The data shows these individuals are not only more likely to become bullies after being targeted, but are also more likely to be victimized in the first place, suggesting a predisposition to entering and perpetuating cycles of online conflict.

The motivation is often straightforward and deeply human: revenge. As researchers in the journal Current Psychology note, the desire to retaliate is a powerful driver that turns the bullied into bullies.

"Individuals who experienced cybervictimization can become offenders on the Internet due to their revenge mo[tivations]."

This creates a self-perpetuating cycle of harm where hurt people, driven by a desire to reclaim a sense of power or inflict reciprocal pain, go on to hurt others. The result is an ecosystem where cruelty begets more cruelty.

3. Cyberbullying is Now More Common Than In-Person Bullying in the U.S.

The primary battlefield for bullying has officially moved online.

For years, cyberbullying was seen as an extension of schoolyard conflicts. That is no longer the case. Recent data shows that cyberbullying has surpassed in-person bullying to become the most prevalent form of harassment among young people in the United States.

According to the Cyberbullying Research Center, 26.5% of middle and high school students report having been cyberbullied in the past 30 days, compared to 25% who report experiencing bullying at school. This shift, which accelerated during the pandemic and has not reversed, marks a fundamental change in the social landscape for young people. This digital shift carries a heavy implication: the home and bedroom, once considered safe havens from schoolyard torment, are now the primary venues where it occurs, blurring the lines between personal life and school and making escape nearly impossible.

4. Most People in a Bullying Incident Are Bystanders—And They Play Different Roles

The silent majority holds more power than it realizes.

In any given cyberbullying incident, the single largest group of participants—making up approximately 75% of those involved—are bystanders. However, not all bystanders are the same. Research has identified distinct sub-roles that witnesses play, each with a different impact on the situation:

  • Assistants: Those who actively help the aggressor.
  • Reinforcers: Those who encourage the bully, perhaps with likes, shares, or supportive comments.
  • Outsiders: Those who see what is happening but ignore it and do nothing.
  • Defenders: Those who support the victim or confront the bully.

Studies consistently find that "Outsiders" are the largest of these sub-groups, meaning the most common response to witnessing cyberbullying is inaction—though some studies find that, encouragingly, defenders who support the victim can sometimes be the most numerous. A key reason for passivity is the nature of digital communication. This is a critical flaw in platforms designed without considering human psychology: by stripping away the non-verbal cues of suffering, the very architecture of social media encourages the passive consumption of cruelty.

5. A Mob of Bullies Can Actually Inspire Intervention

The classic "bystander effect" can reverse online.

A well-known psychological principle, the "bystander effect," posits that the more people who witness an emergency, the less likely any single individual is to help, due to a diffusion of responsibility. In cyberspace, however, this effect gets a surprising twist.

While a large number of bystanders can still diffuse responsibility, a large number of offenders has the opposite effect. Research shows that witnessing a "mob" of multiple aggressors ganging up on a single victim makes a bystander feel a greater sense of personal responsibility and increases their likelihood of intervening. The blatant "power in numbers" of the bullies makes the power imbalance so stark and the situation so obviously unfair that it triggers a stronger impulse to help the underdog. This suggests a crucial tipping point for the silent majority described earlier: while the ambiguity of a single digital insult encourages passivity, the stark clarity of a mob attack can shock them into action.

6. Why a Retweet is a Psychological Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card

Our brains subtly discount the harm of reshared cruelty.

Is there a difference between typing out a hateful message and simply retweeting one? Psychologically, it appears so. Research found that bystanders perceive original, generative messages to be significantly more hurtful than the exact same content when it is retweeted. Witnesses are more likely to appraise an original tweet as an act of cyberbullying.

The reason is that retweets are viewed as "derivative communication"—a lighter, less intentional, and less personal form of sharing. This subtle cognitive bias reveals something profound about our online psychology: we mentally downgrade the harm of reshared negativity. This cognitive discount is not just a psychological quirk; it’s a feature that aligns perfectly with the business models of social media platforms, where the frictionless, 'derivative' share fuels the viral spread that drives engagement—inadvertently facilitating the spread of cruelty by minimizing each user's perceived role in it.

7. The Permanence of the Internet is a Double-Edged Sword

The internet's greatest threat to victims is also one of its greatest tools for justice.

A common fear about cyberbullying is the permanence of the internet. A hurtful post, an embarrassing photo, or a vicious rumor can be archived forever, haunting a victim for years. But this very permanence has a surprising and powerful upside: it creates an indisputable evidence trail.

Unlike in-person bullying, which often happens without witnesses and leaves no physical trace, cyberbullying creates a permanent digital record.

"...online bullying does leave tangible evidence. Unlike physical or emotional bullying, online bullying leaves a digital footprint; the words, images, or videos posted can be documented through screenshots or saving URLs and texts, which can be useful."

This unique characteristic fundamentally changes the power dynamic. It empowers victims, parents, and authorities by transforming the digital space from just a scene of the crime into a permanent archive. This permanence not only empowers victims but also puts schools and other authorities on notice; the excuse that bullying is an ephemeral, 'he said, she said' problem no longer holds up when a verifiable digital record exists.


Conclusion

The narrative of cyberbullying is not a simple one. It is a deeply complex phenomenon shaped by the darkest parts of human psychology, the intricate dynamics of social behavior, and the fundamental architecture of our digital world. The enjoyment of cruelty, the cycle of revenge, and the subtle ways our brains interpret a retweet versus an original post all play a role in how online harassment unfolds.

Understanding these surprising truths does more than satisfy academic curiosity. It equips us to see the problem with clearer eyes, moving past simplistic assumptions and toward more effective, nuanced solutions. Acknowledging this complexity is the first, essential step toward fostering a safer and more empathetic online world for everyone.

Knowing this, what is our individual responsibility the next time we witness cruelty unfold on our screens?

SlideShare: Click Here