Saturday, July 5, 2025

An Astrologer’s Day by R K Narayan

This blog task is assigned by Megha Trivedi Ma'am (Department of English, MKBU). 

           An Astrologer’s Day by R K Narayan        

R.K.Narayan : 

R.K.Narayan

Category

Details

Full Name

Rasipuram Krishnaswami Iyer Narayanaswami

Pen Name

R. K. Narayan

Date of Birth – Death

October 10, 1906 – May 13, 2001

Place of Birth

Madras (now Chennai), British India

Education

B.A. in Arts from Maharaja’s College, Mysore

Profession

Novelist, Short Story Writer, Essayist

Language of Writing

English

Genre

Fiction (social realism, humour, simplicity, Indian middle-class life)

Famous Fictional Town

Malgudi – A created South Indian town used in most of his works

First Novel

Swami and Friends (1935) – Introduced Malgudi and childhood themes

Major Novels

The Bachelor of Arts, The English Teacher, The Guide, The Vendor of Sweets

Children’s Works

Malgudi Days, Grandmother's Tale – Short stories with humour and insight

Essay Collections

Next Sunday, The Emerald Route, Reluctant Guru

Autobiography

My Days (1974) – A personal account of his life and career

Mythological Works

Retellings of The Ramayana and The Mahabharata in English

Adaptations

The Guide (film, 1965), Malgudi Days (TV series by Shankar Nag, 1986)

Writing Style

Simple language, comic irony, empathy, rooted in Indian ethos

Themes

Everyday Indian life, urban-rural culture, personal and spiritual growth

Awards & Honours

Sahitya Akademi Award (1958), Padma Bhushan (1964), Padma Vibhushan (1994), AC Benson Medal (1980)

International Recognition

Honorary Membership of the American Academy of Arts and Letters (1986)




An Astrologer’s Day 

Element

Details & Explanation

Supporting Quote / Example

Setting

Bustling marketplace in Malgudi; chaotic, dimly lit, vibrant. Reflects themes of illusion and uncertainty.

“A bewildering criss-cross of light rays and moving shadows.”

Plot

A fake astrologer accidentally encounters a man he once tried to kill and gains peace after learning he survived.

“A great load is gone from me today.”

Structure

Linear plot with a twist; slow buildup to climactic revelation and a quiet emotional resolution.

Begins with routine → unexpected stranger → truth revealed → closure.

Main Character

Astrologer: Not a true seer; a man haunted by guilt, who finds redemption through chance.

“He knew no more… than he knew what was going to happen to himself.”

Other Characters

Guru Nayak: Seeker of revenge, unknowingly finds closure.

Wife: Represents domestic normalcy.

“He has escaped my hands… I hope at least he died as he deserved.”

Themes

- Illusion vs. Reality

- Guilt and Redemption

- Fate vs. Free Will

- Power of Belief

“He was as much a stranger to the stars…”

“Rub this on your forehead…”

Style & Tone

Simple, ironic, observant, rich in cultural realism. Understated but profound.

“Even a half-wit’s eyes would sparkle in such a setting.”

Narrative Voice

Third-person omniscient; allows subtle irony and deep character insight.

Narayan balances empathy with satire.

Symbolism

Light and darkness = truth and deception. Marketplace = society’s hunger for belief and identity.

“The green shaft of light was blotted out.”

Moral Message

People may live by lies, but even lies can bring unexpected truth and healing.

“Do you know a great load is gone from me today?”



Pre-Viewing Tasks:


Observe the setting, plot, character, structure, style, theme of the original short story.
“He knew no more of what was going to happen to others than he knew what was going to happen to himself next minute.”

R.K. Narayan’s short story “An Astrologer’s Day” is a deceptively simple tale that unfolds in the fictional South Indian town of Malgudi, yet within its compact narrative lies an astonishingly rich exploration of human psychology, moral ambiguity, social deception, and emotional redemption. Blending gentle irony with deep existential insight, Narayan’s story explores how identity can be constructed through fear and how illusion often serves as a shelter for truth.

This analysis covers every key literary element of the story — from its plot and structure to its setting, characters, style, and dominant themes — to offer a full understanding for students, readers, and literary enthusiasts alike.

1. Plot Summary: A Tale of Deception, Memory, and Redemption

The story revolves around an unnamed man who poses as a professional astrologer, setting up his modest booth every day beneath a tamarind tree in the crowded Town Hall Park. He wears saffron clothes, smears sacred ash and vermilion on his forehead, and uses props like cowrie shells and mystic charts to convince customers of his supposed clairvoyant abilities.

“His forehead was resplendent with sacred ash and vermilion, and his eyes sparkled with a sharp abnormal gleam… People were attracted to him as bees are attracted to cosmos or dahlia stalks.”

Despite having no knowledge of astrology, he successfully manipulates his clients by listening carefully and giving vague, flattering advice.

One evening, as he is about to pack up, a mysterious and aggressive stranger approaches. This man challenges the astrologer to prove his powers by answering a real question. As light from the stranger’s cheroot briefly reveals his face, the astrologer is struck by the realization: this man is Guru Nayak, whom he had believed he had killed years ago in a drunken brawl.

“You were left for dead. Am I right?”

Quickly regaining composure, the astrologer manipulates the conversation. He tells Guru Nayak that his attacker (in reality, himself) is dead and warns him never to return south, or he might meet the same fate.

“He died four months ago in a far-off town. You will never see any more of him.”

After the stranger leaves, appeased and satisfied, the astrologer returns home and confesses to his wife that the man he believed he had killed is still alive, freeing him from years of guilt.

“A great load is gone from me today. I thought I had the blood of a man on my hands all these years.”

This final moment adds an emotional twist, transforming a tale of deception into a story of unexpected redemption and peace.

2. Setting: The Market as Metaphor

“The place was lit up by shop lights… some had naked flares stuck on poles… It was a bewildering criss-cross of light rays and moving shadows.”

The story is set in a busy Indian market street — a place bustling with vendors, sounds, smells, and shadows. This marketplace, full of sellers of medicine, stolen goods, peanuts, and magic, represents a space of illusion and performance, where truth is blurred and identity is constantly staged.

The astrologer’s booth is not isolated; it is part of a noisy, unregulated, and dimly lit environment — ideal for someone living a constructed identity. The absence of municipal lighting enhances the shadows, reflecting the moral ambiguity and psychological uncertainty that govern the story.

3. Structure: From Routine to Revelation

Narayan’s narrative follows a classic linear structure with a powerful twist:

  • Exposition: Introduction of the astrologer’s life, setting, and methods.
  • Rising Action: The arrival of the mysterious stranger and the astrologer’s nervous reaction.
  • Climax: The revelation that the stranger is Guru Nayak.
  • Falling Action: The astrologer uses truth disguised as prophecy to send the man away.
  • Resolution: The astrologer’s confession to his wife and emotional release.

This structure allows Narayan to slowly peel back the layers of his protagonist, transitioning from everyday conman to a man confronting his past crime and moral self.

4. Character Analysis: Complex Figures Beneath Simple Surfaces
 
  • The Astrologer
He is the central figure — a man who reinvents himself in the city to escape his violent past. Though he earns his living through lies, he is not shown as evil. Instead, he is human — shaped by fear, guilt, survival, and remorse.

“If he had continued there he would have carried on the work of his forefathers — namely, tilling the land… But that was not to be.”

He is cunning, intuitive, and manipulative, but also emotionally vulnerable. His moment of honesty, when he confronts Guru Nayak, is not driven by morality but self-preservation — and yet it becomes his moment of redemption.

  • Guru Nayak
A vengeful man still hunting the person who once tried to murder him, Guru Nayak represents the unresolved past. Ironically, he finds closure through a lie. His belief that his enemy is dead ends his search, not justice — a poignant commentary on how belief can overpower reality.

  • The Wife
Though her appearance is brief, she adds emotional grounding to the story. Her practical concerns — buying sweets for the child — contrast the astrologer’s internal crisis, highlighting the quiet domestic world he has built as a shield from his past.

 5. Style: Irony, Simplicity, and Subtle Power

Narayan’s prose is marked by economy of language, gentle satire, and profound psychological depth. He uses third-person omniscient narration with dry, often ironic commentary.

“Even a half-wit’s eyes would sparkle in such a setting.”

This line mocks the astrologer's appearance while hinting at the absurdity of belief based solely on appearance. Narayan's style never moralizes; instead, it presents characters as they are — flawed, self-protective, human.

6. Themes: Deep Meanings Behind a Simple Story
  •  Appearance vs. Reality
The entire story is built on the illusion of power and the performance of truth. The astrologer wears the costume of mysticism, but his success lies in observation, psychology, and clever language — not stars.
“He was as much a stranger to the stars as were his innocent customers.”
  • Guilt and Redemption
The story pivots around the astrologer’s buried guilt. His past resurfaces unexpectedly, and while his truth is hidden under another lie, the result is genuine emotional relief.
“A great load is gone from me today.”
  • Fate vs. Free Will
While the astrologer sells fate-based predictions, the story subtly suggests that people are shaped more by past actions than planetary positions. The twist shows that what looks like fate is often just accident, memory, and decision.

  • The Human Need for Belief
Both Guru Nayak and the common people choose to believe what comforts them. In a chaotic world, astrology becomes a coping mechanism, even if it’s based on falsehood.

Conclusion: A Starless Man Who Gives Light

In the end, R.K. Narayan’s “An Astrologer’s Day” is not about astrology at all. It is about how people construct and reconstruct their lives — often through performance, often through deception — to escape trauma, guilt, or failure. The astrologer, though a fraud by profession, emerges as a deeply human figure, whose encounter with a former victim becomes the key to his own psychological healing.

Narayan brilliantly crafts a story where truth masquerades as fiction, and fiction becomes a vehicle for truth. In doing so, he gives us a tale not just about a man reading palms — but about a man reading life itself.

While-Viewing Tasks
  • The beginning
  • Important Scenes – The encounter with Guru Nayak, The conversation with wife, The market scene
  • The End
  • The Climax Scene


The Beginning:

The story begins with an astrologer setting up his stall in a busy market. He appears mysterious and insightful, offering advice to troubled people. We see his daily routine, the setting, and the kind of people who come to seek his help. There’s a blend of music and mysticism in the atmosphere.

Important Scenes:

  • The Encounter with Guru Nayak:

This is a turning point in the story. A stranger named Guru Nayak confronts the astrologer with intense questions. The astrologer seems unusually alert and cautious. As their conversation progresses, it is revealed that Guru Nayak is unknowingly speaking to the same man who had once tried to kill him. The astrologer, through clever manipulation and astrology tricks, convinces Guru Nayak that the man he seeks (the would-be murderer) is already dead—crushed under a lorry. This allows the astrologer to hide his past crime and escape suspicion.

  • The Conversation with Wife:

After the tense encounter, the astrologer returns home. His wife, Usha, notices a change in him. When she inquires, he finally confesses the truth he had kept hidden for years: he once tried to kill a man during a drunken fight in the village. He fled thinking he had committed murder. But now, he has discovered that the man (Guru Nayak) is alive. This revelation brings him peace and relief, as he no longer carries the guilt of having blood on his hands.

  • The Market Scene:

The bustling market is where most of the action happens. It reflects everyday life, noise, business, and hidden stories. The market is also the place where fate unexpectedly brings the astrologer face-to-face with his past. The lively crowd contrasts sharply with the intense personal drama unfolding between the astrologer and Guru Nayak.

The Climax Scene:

The climax occurs during the intense conversation between the astrologer and Guru Nayak. The astrologer uses his knowledge and presence of mind to protect himself. When he realizes the man before him is the very one he thought he had killed, he calmly lies that the attacker (himself) is already dead. This lie not only saves him from being exposed but also frees him from years of guilt. The moment is suspenseful and emotionally charged.

The End:

The story ends with the astrologer at peace. He returns home and shares the secret of his past with his wife. For years, he believed he had committed murder, but now he knows that the man survived. This realization lifts a heavy burden from his heart. The tale ends with a sense of relief, closure, and irony—showing how life can twist in unexpected ways.

Post – Viewing Tasks:

(Give responses to these questions in your blog and share the blog link in the comment section here and also in the Google Classroom)

·         How faithful is the movie to the original short story?

·         After watching the movie, have your perception about the short story, characters or situations changed?

·         Do you feel ‘aesthetic delight’ while watching the movie? If yes, exactly when did it happen? If no, can you explain with reasons?

· ·         Does screening of movie help you in better understanding of the short story?

·         Was there any particular scene or moment in the story that you think was perfect?

·         If you are director, what changes would you like to make in the remaking of the movie based on the short story “An Astrologer’s Day” by R.K.Narayan?

1. How faithful is the movie to the original short story?

The movie is largely faithful to the original story in its plot, character portrayal, and climax. The central twist — that the astrologer was the man who once tried to kill Guru Nayak — remains intact. The market setting, the astrologer’s attire, the sudden encounter, the emotional shift, and the relief at the end are all preserved well. However, the screenplay expands upon the astrologer’s personal life by showing extended conversations with his wife, Usha, and even gives Chutki (their daughter) a voice, which is absent in the original. These additions provide emotional layering but diverge slightly from R.K. Narayan’s minimalistic narrative style.

2. After watching the movie, have your perception about the short story, characters or situations changed?

Yes, the movie adds a human dimension to the astrologer. In the story, he is clever, secretive, and survives on guesswork and performance. But the film shows him as a man burdened by guilt and trauma, trying to live an honest life after a dark past. Usha's presence and her questions add tenderness. The market feels more alive and chaotic, and Guru Nayak appears more intimidating on screen. The astrologer’s final relief, which seemed casual in the story, felt much deeper in the film.

3. Do you feel ‘aesthetic delight’ while watching the movie? 

If yes, exactly when did it happen? If no, can you explain with reasons?
Yes, I did feel aesthetic delight, especially during the climactic revelation scene. When the astrologer slowly realizes the identity of Guru Nayak and cleverly maneuvers the conversation to protect his secret — that moment was charged with tension, emotion, and irony. The background music, lighting, and the expressions added a cinematic beauty to a literary twist. The delight came from watching the twist unfold visually, which heightened the suspense beyond what the written word could express.

4. Does screening of movie help you in better understanding of the short story?

Absolutely. The movie enhanced my understanding of the astrologer’s inner conflict. The story briefly mentions that he ran away from his village after a violent incident, but the film shows this through emotional dialogue and flashback-like conversations. Watching body language, facial expressions, and pauses brought out subtext that was easy to overlook while reading. The setting also helped me visualize the chaotic market scene and how the astrologer camouflaged his identity in the crowd.

5. Was there any particular scene or moment in the story that you think was perfect?

Yes, the scene where the astrologer says to Guru Nayak: “You were left for dead… pushed into a well...” was perfect both in the story and in the film. It was intense, emotionally charged, and the turning point of the plot. In the film, Guru Nayak’s astonishment and the astrologer’s nervousness were beautifully acted out, making it a gripping watch. It revealed both the suspense and the relief — the heart of Narayan’s twist.

6. If you are the director, what changes would you like to make in the remaking of the movie based on the short story “An Astrologer’s Day” by R.K.Narayan?

If I were to direct a new adaptation of An Astrologer’s Day, I would aim to balance fidelity to the original with a cinematic style that heightens emotion, suspense, and introspection. Here are the changes I would consider:

  • Focus on Inner Conflict through Visual Storytelling:

I would use close-up shots and minimal dialogue to express the astrologer’s inner guilt, especially during the encounter with Guru Nayak. This psychological depth can be powerfully conveyed through his nervous glances, trembling hands, or a moment of frozen silence when he recognizes his victim.

  • Eliminate Over-Explanatory Lines:

Some parts of the current film script make the themes too obvious. I would prefer subtlety, trusting the audience to pick up on clues through actions, facial expressions, and symbolic imagery rather than direct exposition.

  • Introduce a Symbolic Motif:

I’d add a recurring visual motif—such as the astrologer washing his hands or avoiding looking into mirrors—to symbolize his buried guilt. When he learns that the man is alive, these actions could change—perhaps he finally looks into the mirror with peace.

  • Expand the Ending with Poetic Closure:

Rather than ending the film with just domestic relief, I would include a visual of the astrologer walking through the empty street, looking up at the stars with a complex expression—relieved but still aware of life’s irony. A minimal background score would enhance this mood.

  • Add Depth to the Wife’s Character:

Usha could be shown as more than just a domestic figure. She might suspect that her husband has a hidden past. Her concern and acceptance could deepen the emotional resonance of the final revelation.

  • Market Scene as a Character Itself:

The market is more than a setting—it mirrors the astrologer's life: chaotic, deceptive, and full of noise. I would use sound design and camera movement to make the marketplace feel like a living, breathing character that pressures the astrologer to keep his truth hidden.

  • Final Scene with Guru Nayak:

I would show Guru Nayak walking away and briefly glancing back, confused but somehow satisfied. The astrologer would remain seated, sweating and still. That slight ambiguity would let viewers wonder: Who really won in that moment?

References : 

"An Astrologer’s Day – Hindi Short Film." YouTube, uploaded by Antara Creation, 25 May 2017, www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkfrjYFQozA

Narayan, R. K. Malgudi Days. Penguin, 2006.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. "R.K. Narayan". Encyclopedia Britannica, 9 May. 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/R-K-Narayan

Vaidehi. “Worksheet: Screening of Short Film.” Vaidehi09, 9 Sept. 2021, vaidehi09.blogspot.com/2021/09/worksheet-screening-of-short-film.html.


Thursday, July 3, 2025

Poststructuralism, Poems, and Gen AI: Deconstructive Reading


This blog is created as part of my coursework for the Master of Arts in English Literature, under the unit "Derrida and Deconstruction". The task , assigned by our professor, involves a two-part task:

  • Generating two original poems on the themes of Existentialism and Digital Humanities.
  • Analyzing these poems through the lens of Poststructuralist and Deconstructionist theory, using Peter Barry’s three-stage deconstructive model and Catherine Belsey’s poststructuralist approach.
For background reading and theoretical context, refer to the source below: Click here for background reading

In an age where digital tools are reshaping every corner of the humanities, this literary project sets out to explore what happens when creativity, artificial intelligence, and critical theory converge. The core of the project involves generating two original poems—one centered on Existentialism and the other on Digital Humanities—and then engaging in rigorous literary analysis through the lens of Poststructuralist and Deconstructionist theory.

What makes this project unique is the use of ChatGPT in both the creative and critical phases. The poems themselves were composed using AI, demonstrating how generative models can participate in the production of literary art. Yet this project goes further, using AI not merely as a poetic engine, but as a partner in the application of complex theoretical frameworks. The first poem, “The Weight of Choice,” is examined using Peter Barry’s three-step deconstructive method—verbal, textual, and linguistic—unveiling the instability of meaning, the tensions within language, and the fragmentation of philosophical binaries. The second poem, “The Code Within the Text,” is analyzed through Catherine Belsey’s poststructuralist approach, emphasizing how meaning is culturally coded, how language resists singularity, and how interpretation is shaped by ideological positioning.

By combining digital creativity with poststructuralist critique, this project not only foregrounds the unfixed nature of meaning, but also shows the value of using AI as a reflective tool in contemporary literary studies. The process opens new possibilities: what does it mean for language to be “slippery” when composed by a machine? Can an AI-generated poem still carry the anxieties of existentialism, or expose the ideological tensions of digital culture?

Ultimately, this experiment is not just about poems or theories—it’s about testing the boundaries of what it means to write, interpret, and question meaning in a digitally mediated world.


Poem: "The Weight of Choice"

We walk alone beneath a voiceless sky,
No gods respond, no truth to clarify.
The stars burn cold, yet still we seek their flame,
To find a script, a cause, a guiding name.
The self must carve its path through doubt and dust,
In freedom lies both terror and our trust.
What meaning clings when time itself must fall?
What voice remains when silence swallows all?
Yet in this void, we forge our will to be,
Defining fate with raw autonomy.
No essence comes before our act begins—
We’re burdened gods, condemned to choose our sins.




1. Verbal Stage – Oppositional Words

In this stage, we identify key binary oppositions that structure the poem’s surface meaning. The poem builds itself around existential binaries:

  • Self / Void – "The self must carve..." vs. "we walk alone... beneath a voiceless sky."
  • Freedom / Condemnation – “In freedom lies… terror” vs. “burdened gods, condemned…”
  • Voice / Silence – “What voice remains…” vs. “silence swallows all”
  • Truth / Uncertainty – “No truth to clarify” vs. “we forge our will”
  • Essence / Action – “No essence comes before our act begins”
  • Gods / Humans – “We’re burdened gods”

These oppositions suggest clarity and structure, implying the speaker is navigating a coherent philosophical landscape.

2. Textual Stage – Tensions and Contradictions

Here, we interrogate the coherence of the poem’s message. On the surface, the poem promotes existential freedom: we are alone, meaning is not given, and we must create our own values. But beneath this confident existential tone, the poem betrays its own anxiety.

  • Contradiction 1: The phrase “burdened gods” is self-negating. Gods are by definition sovereign and unburdened, yet here they are condemned and weighed down. This juxtaposition reveals tension between autonomy and despair.
  • Contradiction 2: The line “No essence comes before our act begins” expresses Sartrean existentialism, but calling ourselves “condemned” to choose introduces a negative valence, undermining the optimism of freedom.
  • Contradiction 3: “To find a script, a cause, a guiding name” implies desire for structure, which clashes with the poem’s claim that no structure or meaning exists. The speaker seeks what the universe lacks.
These tensions suggest that the poem, while claiming to affirm choice and autonomy, is haunted by the very lack of meaning it seeks to overcome.

3. Linguistic Stage – Language Undermines Meaning

This is the most radical stage: we show that language itself destabilizes the poem’s message. Deconstruction here emphasizes how signifiers slip and resist fixed reference.
  • The word “voice” occurs in “voiceless sky” and “What voice remains,” implying communication and clarity, yet it is surrounded by silence. Voice collapses into silence, so its meaning is unstable.
  • The poem ends with “choose our sins” — a phrase that assumes moral categories, but earlier we were told that “no truth” exists. If there is no truth or standard, how can we name anything a ‘sin’? This reveals a residue of metaphysical thought in a supposedly anti-metaphysical poem.
  • The phrase “we forge our will” sounds assertive but also metallic and mechanical, hinting at an unnatural process. “Forge” can mean both to create and to fake—an undecidable pun that undermines the reality of the self’s power.
  • Finally, “burdened gods” is an oxymoron. The metaphorical use of “gods” implies power, but "burdened" negates it. The phrase performs what Derrida calls différance—a meaning that is both there and deferred, divided within itself.
In essence, the poem attempts to establish existential truth, but the language it uses slips out of control, producing ambiguity, irony, and conceptual instability.

Conclusion 

According to Peter Barry’s model:
  • At the verbal level, the poem presents confident oppositions between meaning and meaninglessness, self and void.
  • At the textual level, it undermines its surface existentialism by revealing anxiety, contradiction, and unresolved tension.
  • At the linguistic level, the very words and metaphors used betray undecidability, slipping meanings, and the impossibility of a stable message.
Thus, the poem deconstructs itself—not by accident, but by performing the very linguistic and philosophical instability that post-structuralist deconstruction uncovers.

Sonnet: "The Code Within the Text"

In glowing screens, the ancient lines are cast,
Encoded echoes from the age of ink.
What once was bound in vellum, fading fast,
Now speaks anew in data's fluid link.
The scholar's gaze now scans with widened eyes,
Through networks vast where meanings interlace.
The archive breathes beneath electric skies,
As algorithms trace the ghost of grace.
Machine and mind in dialogue engage—
A lexicon reborn in silicon.
We map the myths, the themes from age to age,
With circuits tuned to truth and Babylon.
Yet still the soul must seek through wire and wave,
What lies beneath what language could not save.



Introduction to Belsey’s Poststructuralist Approach

Catherine Belsey, in Critical Practice, challenges the assumption that texts possess inherent, stable meanings. Instead, she shows that:
  • Meaning is not fixed, but constructed in language.
  • Language is not transparent, but a system of signs that refer only to other signs.
  • Meaning arises from intertextuality, cultural codes, and reader positioning, not authorial intent.
  • Texts are sites of ideological struggle, not neutral carriers of truth.

Using Belsey’s method, we will demonstrate how “The Code Within the Text” is not a simple celebration of digital progress, but a complex site of unstable meaning, ideological tension, and cultural re-inscription.

1. Meaning Is Not Fixed

On the surface, the poem appears to celebrate how technology preserves and revitalizes ancient texts. But a Belsey-style reading asks: Is that all it says?

Take the final couplet:
“Yet still the soul must seek through wire and wave, / What lies beneath what language could not save.”
  • This undermines the earlier optimistic claim that “the archive breathes” and that we “map the myths.”
  • “Language could not save” implies that something essential has been lost, perhaps irretrievably.
  • So, even as the poem affirms the digital resurrection of culture, it hints at a deeper absence—the soul, meaning, or presence that cannot be retrieved through screens or circuits.
Thus, meaning is ambiguous, split between technological triumph and cultural mourning.

2. Language Resists Stability

In line with Belsey's method, let’s examine how the language resists precise anchoring:

a. Metaphor as a Vehicle of Instability
  • Phrases like “ghost of grace” and “lexicon reborn” rely on unstable metaphors. Is “grace” divine, aesthetic, or cultural? Is the “rebirth” authentic, or a simulation?
  • The term “encoded echoes” is inherently slippery: an echo is a repetition already detached from origin, and encoding adds further layers of mediation.

b. Contradictory Diction
  • Words like “trace” and “map” suggest precision—but paired with “myths” and “ghost,” these terms gain ambivalence. What is being mapped—truth, or illusion?
c. Ambiguous Syntax
 “With circuits tuned to truth and Babylon.”
  • “Babylon” is multivalent: a biblical symbol of decadence, a metaphor for civilization, or a code for confusion (as in ‘Babel’).
  • The phrase “tuned to truth” sounds exact—but what “truth”? The word invites belief while resisting definition. 
Thus, language in this poem refuses to pin down a singular message, enacting the poststructuralist belief that signifiers float, never fully securing what they signify.

3. Interpretation Depends on Cultural Codes

Cultural codes shape the reader’s response. Different interpretive communities will read this sonnet through different lenses:

a. Digital Humanist Reading
  • A scholar familiar with DH might celebrate the poem’s affirmation of machine-human synergy, reading “silicon” and “circuits” as signs of progress.
b. Romantic or Humanist Reading
  • Another reader might find the poem melancholic, mourning the loss of presence, the “soul” that machines cannot retrieve, echoing Belsey’s idea that texts are not unified but divided by ideological conflict.
c. Poststructuralist Reading

The interplay of “algorithm” and “archive,” “data” and “grace,” points to the constructedness of knowledge—what Belsey calls a critique of the transparency of signification.


In this view, the poem enacts the instability of its own claims: it cannot firmly assert the power of digital media without also gesturing toward its limits.


4. The Reader Constructs the Text

As Belsey argued in her reading of Sonnet 18, meaning is not author-given but reader-activated.
  • The line “The scholar’s gaze now scans with widened eyes” invites identification—but who is this scholar?
  • Is it a figure of knowledge and hope?
  • Or a passive consumer of digital fragments?
The poem interpellates the reader into a specific position—but does so uncertainly, allowing multiple identifications. This aligns with Belsey’s belief that the text positions the reader ideologically, but the position is never singular or secure.

Conclusion: 

Using Catherine Belsey’s poststructuralist model, we can say that:

  • The poem’s surface meaning (digital revival of literature) is destabilized by its deeper tensions and contradictions.
  • Language itself is revealed as unstable, metaphorical, and contradictory—never wholly under control.
  • Meaning arises from cultural codes, interpretive positions, and ideological frameworks—not from the poem’s internal unity or authorial intent.
  • The poem becomes a site of struggle, between technology and soul, preservation and loss, system and mystery—mirroring Belsey’s poststructuralist claim that all texts are open, plural, and ideologically charged.

REFERENCES: 

Barad, Dilip. Deconstructive Analysis of Ezra Pound's "In a Station of the Metro" and William Carlos Williams's "The Red Wheelbarrow." ResearchGate, July 2024, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381943844_Deconstructive_Analysis_of_Ezra_Pound's_'In_a_Station_of_the_Metro'_and_William_Carlos_Williams's_'The_Red_Wheelbarrow'.

Barad, Dilip. Poetry and Poststructuralism: An AI‑Powered Analysis. July 2024. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11536.42248. ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382114259_Poetry_and_Poststructuralism_An_AI‑Powered_Analysis.

Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory. 3rd ed., Viva Books Private Limited, 2010.

Belsey, Catherine. Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford, 2002.

What the Poem Doesn’t Say: A Deconstructive Reading of Modern Verse

This blog task is assigned by our professor, Dr. Dilip Barad Sir, as part of the unit “Derrida and Deconstruction.”
For the background reading, click here.

In a world where literature often seems to carry fixed meanings and timeless truths, poststructuralist theory invites us to pause, look closer, and ask: What if meaning is never stable? What if a text says more than it intends — or even the opposite?

This blog begins exactly at that point of inquiry. It is shaped by three guiding materials that provide both theory and practical demonstration. First, the short video "How to Deconstruct a Text: Sonnet 18 – Shall I Compare Thee?" introduces the basic principles of deconstruction by exploring Shakespeare’s iconic sonnet, showing how poetic language can both express and undermine itself.

Next, we move to Catherine Belsey’s Poststructuralism (pgs. 19–21), where she discusses “The primacy of the signifier” through two celebrated short poems: Ezra Pound’s In a Station of the Metro and William Carlos Williams’s The Red Wheelbarrow. Belsey’s close reading reveals how meaning emerges not from reference to real-world things, but from the play of language itself — sound, rhythm, and image.

Finally, drawing from Peter Barry’s Beginning Theory (pgs. 56–58), we explore what post-structuralist critics actually do. Barry offers a clear, three-step model of deconstruction — verbal, textual, and linguistic — using Dylan Thomas’s A Refusal to Mourn the Death, by Fire, of a Child in London as a rich example. This section illustrates how a poem’s apparent unity can unravel into contradictions, paradoxes, and multiple meanings when examined through a post-structuralist lens.

Through this blog, I aim to connect these texts and techniques, not only to explain the theory behind deconstruction, but to apply it in practice, showing how close reading under poststructuralism can radically transform our understanding of poetry.

Sonnet 18: Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?





Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?
Thou art more lovely and more temperate:
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer’s lease hath all too short a date;
Sometime too hot the eye of heaven shines,
And often is his gold complexion dimm'd;
And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By chance or nature’s changing course untrimm'd;
But thy eternal summer shall not fade,
Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow’st;
Nor shall death brag thou wander’st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou grow’st:
   So long as men can breathe or eyes can see,
   So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.




1. The First Word “I” – Authority of the Speaker
  • The poem opens with “Shall I...” – an assertion of subjective control.
  • The speaker places himself at the center—as the one who defines beauty, decides comparison, and confers immortality.
  • This is a clear act of linguistic hegemony—where the subjectivity of the speaker dominates the beloved, turning the beloved into a passive object of poetic gaze.
  • Deconstruction challenges this hierarchy: Who gives the speaker such authority? Can language really define or eternalize a person?

2. Binary Opposition 1: Human Being (Beloved) vs. Nature (Summer’s Day)
  • Nature is described as unreliable: “Rough winds,” “too hot,” “too short,” “declines.”
  • The beloved is presented as more lovely and temperate.
  • But: Is this really true? Or is it just the speaker’s constructed version?
  • Deconstruction collapses the binary—the poem depends on nature to describe the beloved. So, it can’t fully separate the two.
  • Paradox: To praise the beloved beyond nature, the poem must rely on nature’s language.

3. Binary Opposition 2: Beloved (Real Body) vs. Lines (Poetic Writing)
  • Lines: “When in eternal lines to time thou grow’st”
  • Poem claims to immortalize the beloved, but in doing so, it replaces her physical body with poetic lines.
  • The real person disappears—only a linguistic version remains.
  • Thus, the beloved is no longer real, but a symbol—subject to free play of interpretation.
4. Free Play and Instability of Meaning
  • Words like “fair,” “temperate,” “eternal,” and “declines” are not fixed in meaning.
  • “Fair” can mean beautiful, equal, or temporary.
  • “Temperate” could suggest moderation, but also dullness.
  • These words slide in meaning, leading to free play.
  • The beloved’s beauty is said to be eternal, but it exists only in the poem, which depends on readers, language, and time—all of which are unstable.
  • Therefore, the poem undermines its own claim of permanence.

5. Undecidability of the Poem’s Meaning
  • Is this poem truly about love?
  • Or is it a celebration of poetic power, ego, and authorship?
  • The poem seems to say:
  • “I have made you eternal.”
  • But eternity is dependent on the survival of language, and the reader’s act of reading.
  • Hence, the poem becomes self-referential—about its own writing, not about the beloved.

6. Hegemony of the Writer / Power over Time and Death

Lines like:
  • “Nor shall death brag thou wander’st in his shade”
  • suggest that the poet defeats death with writing.
  • But death and time are natural, while the poem is constructed.
  • So who really has power—language or nature?
  • The poem appears hegemonic—language is shown to dominate nature, time, even death—but deconstruction questions this claim.
  • Language is not stable, and therefore, cannot claim true dominance.
7. Subjectivity Constructed through Language
  • The speaker constructs the beloved entirely through metaphors, comparisons, and similes.
  • The real identity of the beloved is lost—what remains is only a textual image.
  • Thus, the beloved is not a subject, but a signifier within the poet’s language system.
  • Deconstruction reveals that the poem is about the poet’s desire to control meaning, not about love.
8. “This” Gives Life – Circular Meaning

Last lines:
  • “So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.”
  • What is “this”? The poem? The language? The metaphor?
  • It’s unclear. The line becomes circular:
The poem gives life to the beloved, but the beloved is the reason for the poem.
  • So the origin of meaning becomes undecidable—does the poem depend on the beloved, or does the beloved depend on the poem?

Classical Reading

Deconstructive Reading

Eternal love poem that immortalizes the beloved

Poem shows illusion of immortality—it’s self-referential, not romantic

Poet praises beloved

Poet praises his own poetic power

Language is stable and meaningful

Language is unstable, full of free play and contradictions

Nature is inferior to human beauty

Nature is used to define beauty, so the binary collapses

Beloved is eternal in the poem

The real person disappears, replaced by textual subjectivity


Poem : 2 : ‘On a Station in the Metro’ by Ezra Pound


The apparition of these faces in the crowd;
Petals on a wet, black bough.

This is a classic Imagist poem — brief, visual, and metaphorically intense.

Key Concepts Explained:

1. Primacy of the Signifier:
  • In literary theory (especially poststructuralism), a signifier is the word or symbol, while the signified is the thing or concept it refers to.
  • In this poem, the signifiers ("faces", "petals", "bough", "apparition") don’t simply point to real things in the world — instead, they create an emotional and aesthetic experience through language itself.
  • The poem separates these images from their real-world context and elevates the symbolic, sensual associations they produce.
So instead of just saying “I saw people at the station,” Pound gives us something deeper and more affective: the ghostly beauty of people’s faces momentarily appearing like petals on a branch — both fleeting and delicate.

2. Visual & Associative Meaning:
  • The faces and petals may refer to real things — but their impact lies in how they are made to resemble each other through the structure of the poem.
  • The connection between faces in a crowd and petals on a bough is not logical; it’s poetic.
  • This analogy isn’t about literal resemblance, but about the emotional response it provokes: the fragility, transience, and beauty of life in a busy, urban world.
The poem invites the reader to fill in the space between the lines — to create the meaning through association, not explanation.

3. Isolation and Poetic Effect:
  • The two lines are visually separated on the page — this layout adds meaning.
  • The white space around them mirrors the fleeting, ghostly quality of the “apparition”.
  • The reader is asked to concentrate on the words themselves, and how they sound and feel, not just what they represent.
4. Rhythm and Sound:
  • The poem also sounds musical:
  • "Crowd" and "bough" almost rhyme.
  • “Petals” and “wet” share soft consonants.
The sound of the poem adds an emotional layer, beyond meaning — this is what Julia Kristeva calls the semiotic.

5. Julia Kristeva’s ‘Semiotic’:
  • Kristeva introduces the idea of the semiotic, a form of meaning-making not based on clear definitions, but on sound, rhythm, and feeling.
  • It’s like the babbling of a child, rich with emotional force even before actual language is used.
  • In this poem, the semiotic power lies in the haunting rhythm, evocative sounds, and suggestive images — it stirs something before we even try to understand it logically.
 Interpretation of the Poem in This Framework:


“The apparition of these faces in the crowd”
Suggests a fleeting ghost-like image — people glimpsed briefly, emotionally resonant but not clearly seen.

“Petals on a wet, black bough”
Suggests softness and fragility against a dark, harsh background — evoking beauty in a fleeting, unexpected moment.

The two images are connected not just in meaning, but through form, placement, sound, and emotion. This connection is created by the poem, not derived from the real world.

Final Thought:

This analysis emphasizes that poetry does not work like everyday language. It isn’t trying to describe a fact but to generate a feeling, a mood, or a realization. Through the primacy of the signifier, sound, and image, Ezra Pound’s two-line poem becomes a powerful meditation on the momentary beauty of human life, using language not to name reality, but to transform it.

Poem : 3 : William Carlos Williams: “The Red Wheelbarrow”

so much depends

upon

a red wheel
barrow

glazed with rain
water

beside the white
chickens

Surface Meaning:

At first glance, this seems like a very simple and straightforward poem:

  • It names everyday farm objects: a red wheelbarrow, rainwater, white chickens.
  • It describes things in a clear, visual way — almost like a still photograph.
  • It starts with a strong claim: "so much depends upon" this very ordinary scene.

So, the first impression is: the poem is emphasizing the importance of ordinary, material things. Real objects. Real colors. Real rain.

But... a Deeper Reading Suggests Something Else:

1. Is this really about real things?

  • The red and white colors are very pure and bright — almost too perfect to be from a real, muddy farm.
  • The wheelbarrow is “glazed with rain water” — this gives it a shiny, almost polished appearance, like a toy or a painting, not a dirty tool from a barn.
So maybe it’s not a realistic farmyard, but a carefully constructed image — like from a children’s picture book or a dreamlike memory.

2. Language, not Reality:

  • The poem doesn't compare things or explain anything.
  • It just places words (or signifiers) carefully on the page — each word or phrase in its own line.
  • The structure and sound of the poem (the rhythm and pattern) are simple, repetitive, almost like a nursery rhyme.
This tells us: the poem is not just describing a real thing — it’s using language and form to create a certain feeling of calmness, innocence, and purity.



Meaning from the Words, Not the World:

The poem isn’t showing us a literal farm — it’s creating a mood, a mental image, a state of mind through words.
  • It’s about how language itself can make us see or feel something.
  • The "so much depends upon" could refer to how we interpret and imagine the scene, not the objects themselves.
Final Understanding:

This poem looks extremely simple — but it actually asks us to think about how poetry works:
  • Do words point to real things?
  • Or do they create their own little world through rhythm, image, and sound?
"The Red Wheelbarrow", just like Pound’s poem, reminds us that in poetry, language doesn’t just describe reality — it can reshape it.

Poem : 4: A Refusal to Mourn the Death, by Fire, of a Child in London by Dylan Thomas

Never until the mankind making
Bird beast and flower
Fathering and all humbling darkness
Tells with silence the last light breaking
And the still hour
Is come of the sea tumbling in harness

And I must enter again the round
Zion of the water bead
And the synagogue of the ear of corn
Shall I let pray the shadow of a sound
Or sow my salt seed
In the least valley of sackcloth to mourn

The majesty and burning of the child's death.
I shall not murder
The mankind of her going with a grave truth
Nor blaspheme down the stations of the breath
With any further
Elegy of innocence and youth.

Deep with the first dead lies London's daughter,
Robed in the long friends,
The grains beyond age, the dark veins of her mother,
Secret by the unmourning water
Of the riding Thames.
After the first death, there is no other.

PART 1: What Is Post-Structuralism and Deconstruction?

Post-structuralist critics (especially deconstructionists) believe that: Language is not stable.

Words don't always clearly point to a single, fixed meaning. A poem may say one thing on the surface but suggest the opposite underneath.

What Structuralists vs. Post-Structuralists Do:

Structuralists

Post-Structuralists

Look for patterns, symmetry, and unity in a text

Look for contradictions, paradoxes, and confusion

Seek order and balance

Seek breaks, shifts, or contradictions

Aim to show coherence

Aim to show how the text contains disunity or instability

Find repetitions and reflections

Find absences, gaps, and disruptions

Focus on what the text says

Focus on what the text hides or contradicts


Post-Structuralist / Deconstructionist Toolkit

Deconstructionists follow three main stages:

1. Verbal Stage

Look closely at individual words or phrases and point out contradictions, double meanings, or logical paradoxes.

Example: If a poem says “the first death, there is no other”, it contradicts itself — the phrase “first” implies there will be a second!

2. Textual Stage

Look at bigger shifts in the poem: changes in tone, perspective, time, or grammar. These are called "fault-lines", and they show the poem is not as stable or unified as it might seem.

Does the speaker suddenly shift from past to present, or from personal to general? That’s a sign of internal contradiction.

3. Linguistic Stage

Look at language itself and how the poem struggles to express what it says it will not — or cannot — say.

For example, if a poem says "I won’t mourn" but then writes 20 lines that are clearly mourning — it shows how language can betray intention.

PART 2: Applying This to Dylan Thomas's Poem

“A Refusal to Mourn the Death, by Fire, of a Child in London”

Here’s how we apply post-structuralist analysis to this specific poem.

1. Verbal Stage – Contradictions in Words

Line: “After the first death, there is no other”
  • On the surface, it suggests death is final and sacred.
  • But “first” implies there could be a second death — so the phrase contradicts itself.
  • This contradiction shows how language slips and creates confusion, even when trying to sound final or absolute.
Another example:

“I shall not murder / The mankind of her going with a grave truth”

  • Here, the speaker condemns conventional mourning, calling it “murder.”
  • But then continues to speak in poetic, ceremonial language — doing exactly what he claimed he wouldn’t.
2. Textual Stage – Shifts and Discontinuities
  • The first two stanzas are cosmic, timeless — they speak of nature, creation, and deep time.
  • Then the third stanza suddenly zooms in on the child’s specific death — the “majesty and burning of the child's death.”
  • Finally, the fourth stanza becomes grand and symbolic again, calling her “London’s daughter.”
These shifts in time, tone, and focus prevent the poem from having one consistent voice or message. It’s unstable, even if it looks beautiful on the surface.

3. Linguistic Stage – Problems with Language
  • Thomas says he will not mourn, yet the entire poem is a deeply emotional tribute — he is mourning.
  • He avoids direct emotional language, but still creates an atmosphere of grief and awe.
  • He tries to resist traditional metaphors (grave, mourning), but then uses elevated religious language: “robed in the long friends, / The grains beyond age, the dark veins of her mother.”
This shows how language forces the speaker into the very expressions he tries to escape. The poem reveals that we cannot fully escape the limits of language — even when we try.

Summary: What This Means for the Poem




“A Refusal to Mourn…” looks like a noble, spiritual rejection of grief — but under deconstruction, it’s full of contradictions.

  • It says it won’t mourn, but does.
  • It shifts perspective from the universal to the personal.
  • It uses metaphor while claiming to resist it.
  • It shows that language is both powerful and unstable — we can’t fully trust it to deliver fixed meanings.
Final Thought:

Deconstruction isn’t about saying “this poem is wrong.” It’s about asking deeper questions:
  • Where does the poem contradict itself?
  • What does it try to say but fail to hold together?
  • What hidden meanings are revealed when we “read it against itself”?
REFERENCES: 

Barad, Dilip. Deconstructive Analysis of Ezra Pound's "In a Station of the Metro" and William Carlos Williams's "The Red Wheelbarrow." ResearchGate, July 2024, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381943844_Deconstructive_Analysis_of_Ezra_Pound's_'In_a_Station_of_the_Metro'_and_William_Carlos_Williams's_'The_Red_Wheelbarrow'.


Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory. 3rd ed., Viva Books Private Limited, 2010.

Belsey, Catherine. Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction. OUP Oxford, 2002.




Foe by J M Coetzee