Ralph Waldo Emerson and his works

Video on LITERATURE - Ralph Waldo Emerson

 Introduction

• Ralph Waldo Emerson is considered the father of American literature.

• His essays in the mid-19th century transformed America's cultural and artistic perspective.

• He encouraged a break from European literary traditions, stating, "We have listened too long to the Courtly muses of Europe."

• His rejection of cultural traditions led to what was called "America's intellectual declaration of independence."

• He introduced themes of generational conflict and transformation in American literature.

Early Life

• Emerson was born in 1803 in Boston, the son of a preacher.

• He descended from a long line of New England ministers rooted in 17th-century Puritanism.

• After his father's death in 1811, his mother took in boarders to support the family.

• He attended Harvard in 1817 and later entered Harvard Divinity School in 1825.

• His influential aunt, Mary Moody Emerson, exposed him to literature, nature, and piety, shaping his intellectual growth.

Nature and Literature

• Ordained as a minister in 1829, he married Ellen Tucker the same year.

• Ellen's death from tuberculosis in 1831 led him to resign from the church.

• He traveled to Europe in 1832, which had a profound impact on his thinking.

• In Paris, he had an epiphany at the "Jardin des Plantes," realizing that nature was within him.

• Meeting English Romantic poets like Coleridge and Wordsworth, he found them uninspiring, leading to his belief that ordinary people could be great.

• This led to his core ideas: the unity of man and nature, and the uniqueness of every individual.

American Originality

• Returning to America in 1833, he became a professional lecturer.

• He remarried, had children, and appeared conventional, but his ideas remained radical.

• His 1836 essay Nature emphasized American originality, urging a shift from European traditions.

• He argued that the present moment is more important than history or tradition.

• Emerson insisted that America should look within itself rather than to its past.

Self-Reliance

• Emerson believed individuals were trapped by tradition, religion, and societal expectations.

• He urged people to free themselves from these constraints and trust their own intuition.

• He criticized history, religion, and society for limiting personal growth.

• His philosophy of "Self-Reliance" emphasized individual integrity above all else.

• He viewed nature as a divine force, advocating for Pantheism—the belief that God exists in all of creation.

• He famously wrote, "The individual is a God in ruins," suggesting people have the potential to rediscover their divine essence.

The Transparent Eyeball and Transcendentalism

• Emerson described a transcendent moment in nature where he felt connected to the universe:

• "I become a transparent eyeball... I see all... I am part or particle of God."

• This idea became central to Transcendentalism, a movement that emphasized nature, spirituality, and self-reliance.

• Emerson saw God not just in grand landscapes but in everyday experiences, even "snow puddles."

The Ordinary

• Emerson valued the ordinary, believing that everyday life was worthy of literature.

• He wrote, "There is no object so foul that intense light will not make it beautiful."

• His influence led to a new wave of American literature:
• Henry David Thoreau’s Walden found the cosmos in a simple pond.
• Walt Whitman credited Emerson for igniting his poetic inspiration.
• Emily Dickinson and Herman Melville drew from his ideas to redefine American literature.

Legacy

• 20th-century critic Harold Bloom credited Emerson with shaping modern American poetry.

• His legacy is one of innovation, rejecting the past in favor of endless exploration.

• As Emerson put it: "I unsettle all things… I simply experiment, an endless seeker with no past at my back."

Answer the following open ended questions in your blog and submit it in your google classroom:

1) In your opinion, which of the following factors can define an individual's identity/nature: 1) Their Speech 2) Their Behavior 3) Their Choices of Material Possession 4) The things that they hide from everybody. Justify your answer.

Defining an Individual’s Identity and Nature: A Literary Perspective

Identity is a complex and fluid construct that evolves over time, shaped by a multitude of external influences and internal reflections. As a postgraduate student of English literature, I perceive identity as an intricate interplay of speech, behavior, material possessions, and hidden aspects of the self. While all these elements contribute to defining an individual’s nature, their significance varies depending on the philosophical, psychological, and literary lenses through which we analyze them.

1. Speech: The Power of Expression

Language is one of the most vital components of identity. The way individuals articulate their thoughts, the words they choose, and the tone they adopt often reflect their upbringing, education, and emotional state. Speech serves as a medium of self-representation—sometimes consciously curated, sometimes an unconscious revelation of deeper thoughts.

Ralph Waldo Emerson, in his essay Self-Reliance, emphasizes the importance of authentic self-expression. He argues that one's words should be a direct reflection of one’s inner convictions rather than a mere echo of societal expectations. Similarly, Shakespeare's characters often reveal their psychological depth through soliloquies—Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” is a prime example of how speech can reflect internal conflicts and existential dilemmas.

However, speech alone is not a foolproof indicator of an individual’s true nature. It can be deceptive, performative, or influenced by external pressures. A person may say what is socially acceptable rather than what they genuinely believe, making speech an unreliable sole determinant of identity.

2. Behavior: Actions Speak Louder Than Words

While speech can be manipulated, behavior often provides a more accurate insight into a person's character. Our actions in moments of crisis, our treatment of those who can do nothing for us, and our everyday habits contribute significantly to shaping our identity.

For instance, in Pride and Prejudice, Mr. Darcy’s reserved nature initially misleads Elizabeth Bennet into misjudging his character. However, his actions—his quiet assistance to Lydia, his genuine care for his loved ones—reveal his true nature more effectively than his words ever could. Literature often portrays behavior as the most reliable indicator of a person’s essence, reinforcing the idea that one’s deeds define them more than their declarations.

That said, behavior can sometimes be socially conditioned. People may act in accordance with societal expectations rather than their true inclinations. Thus, while behavior is a significant determinant of identity, it is not the sole defining factor.

3. Material Possessions: A Reflection or a Mask?

Material possessions often serve as outward symbols of identity. The objects we choose to own—books, clothes, art, gadgets—can reflect our tastes, aspirations, and social status. In The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby’s lavish possessions are a projection of his desire for status and lost love. His mansion, his collection of expensive shirts, and his extravagant parties all serve as extensions of his identity, even though they do not fully reveal his true self.

However, material possessions can also be misleading. Consumer culture encourages people to use objects as a means of crafting a particular image rather than reflecting their true nature. Someone may own books without reading them, wear designer clothes without appreciating their craftsmanship, or surround themselves with symbols of wealth to mask insecurities. Therefore, while material possessions may provide glimpses into a person’s nature, they are not always accurate reflections of it.

4. The Things We Hide: The Most Honest Reflection of Identity

Perhaps the most revealing aspect of a person’s identity lies in what they choose to conceal. Our fears, suppressed desires, regrets, and hidden thoughts often constitute the most genuine part of who we are. Gothic literature, with its exploration of the subconscious, frequently delves into this hidden aspect of identity. In Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Dr. Jekyll’s suppressed urges manifest as Mr. Hyde, illustrating the notion that what we hide can be the most defining part of us.

Virginia Woolf’s Orlando also explores the fluidity of identity, questioning whether our outward expressions truly define us or whether our concealed emotions and experiences shape us more profoundly. The things we hide may stem from social constraints, personal insecurities, or moral dilemmas, but they often hold the rawest truths about who we are.

Conclusion: A Synthesis of Factors

No single factor—speech, behavior, possessions, or secrets—can exclusively define a person’s identity. Instead, identity is a dynamic combination of all these elements, influenced by cultural, psychological, and existential forces. While speech provides a glimpse into one’s thoughts, behavior often reveals truer aspects of character. Material possessions can reflect identity, but they can also serve as masks. Meanwhile, the things we hide may hold the deepest truths about us.

Ultimately, identity is an evolving narrative, shaped by both what we reveal and what we conceal. As literature teaches us, self-awareness and self-acceptance are key to understanding one’s nature. The question of identity remains open-ended—just as each individual is a unique story, ever-changing and never fully deciphered.

2) Do you agree with Emerson's view that every individual is inherently good? If yes, why? If not, why not?

The Inherent Goodness of Individuals: A Critical Perspective

Ralph Waldo Emerson, as a leading figure of the Transcendentalist movement, firmly believed in the inherent goodness of individuals. His philosophy, deeply rooted in self-reliance, nature, and individualism, suggests that every person possesses an innate moral compass that guides them toward truth and virtue. While Emerson’s idealistic view is inspiring and aligns with the fundamental principles of humanism, the question of whether every individual is inherently good remains complex and open to debate.

As a postgraduate student of English literature, my perspective is shaped by both literary and philosophical explorations of human nature. While I acknowledge the optimism in Emerson’s belief, I argue that human nature is not solely defined by inherent goodness; rather, it is shaped by a mixture of innate tendencies, societal influences, personal experiences, and psychological complexities. The human soul contains both light and shadow, and the extent to which goodness prevails depends on various factors.

Emerson’s Perspective: The Divine Spark in Humanity

Emerson, in his essay Self-Reliance, emphasizes the concept of inner divinity. He posits that every individual carries a spark of the divine and, if left to their own devices without societal corruption, they will naturally gravitate toward goodness. This belief stems from Transcendentalism’s assertion that humans and nature are inherently pure and that moral corruption arises primarily from societal constraints rather than from individual flaws.

In Nature, Emerson further argues that by immersing oneself in the natural world, an individual can reconnect with their intrinsic goodness and wisdom. He sees nature as a mirror reflecting the purity and potential of the human soul. From this standpoint, Emerson’s view is profoundly optimistic, envisioning a world where people, if they trust their instincts and reject societal conformity, can embody truth and righteousness.

A Literary Counterargument: The Complexity of Human Nature

While Emerson’s belief in inherent goodness is inspiring, literature across cultures presents a more nuanced view of human nature—one that acknowledges both virtue and vice. Many literary works explore the duality within individuals, illustrating that goodness is not always an innate quality but rather something that must be cultivated through conscious effort and moral choices.

1. Shakespeare’s Exploration of Good and Evil

Shakespeare’s tragedies, particularly Macbeth and Othello, serve as profound studies of human nature. Macbeth, once a noble and loyal soldier, succumbs to ambition and commits heinous acts. His downfall suggests that external influences (such as the witches' prophecies and Lady Macbeth’s manipulation) can corrupt an individual’s moral center. If every human were inherently good, as Emerson suggests, then how do we account for Macbeth’s descent into tyranny? His trajectory indicates that individuals possess both good and evil impulses, and the choices they make determine which side dominates.

2. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies: The Fallacy of Inherent Goodness

In Lord of the Flies, a group of schoolboys stranded on an island gradually descends into savagery. Initially governed by the rules of civilization, they eventually shed their moral constraints, revealing a more primal, violent side of human nature. Golding’s novel suggests that without the structures of society, people do not naturally gravitate toward goodness but rather toward power, domination, and chaos. This directly challenges Emerson’s idea that society corrupts the individual; instead, it posits that civilization restrains the darker aspects of human nature.

3. The Existentialist Perspective: Freedom and Responsibility

Philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Friedrich Nietzsche argue that individuals are not inherently good but rather possess the freedom to shape their own morality. Sartre, in particular, emphasizes that humans are “condemned to be free,” meaning they must take full responsibility for their actions rather than relying on any predetermined essence of goodness. This view aligns with literature that portrays individuals as neither purely good nor purely evil but as complex beings capable of both.

The Role of Society and Moral Development

If human nature is not inherently good, then what role does society play in shaping morality? Contrary to Emerson’s belief that society corrupts individuals, many thinkers argue that moral education, cultural norms, and ethical teachings help cultivate goodness rather than hinder it.

1. Psychological and Social Conditioning

Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory suggests that human beings possess an id (primitive desires), an ego (rational self), and a superego (moral consciousness). The superego, which governs ethical behavior, is largely shaped by social norms and upbringing. This implies that goodness is not entirely innate but rather instilled through moral education and societal expectations.

2. The Impact of Environment on Moral Development

Real-world examples show that human behavior is significantly influenced by upbringing and environment. A child raised in a nurturing environment with strong moral guidance is more likely to exhibit kindness and empathy, whereas one exposed to violence and neglect may develop harmful tendencies. This further complicates Emerson’s claim, as it suggests that goodness is not inherent but cultivated through experience.

The Dual Nature of Humanity: A Balanced Perspective

Rather than accepting Emerson’s view wholesale or rejecting it outright, I believe that human nature is a duality—a fusion of both goodness and moral ambiguity. Literature, history, and psychology demonstrate that individuals possess the potential for both altruism and selfishness, for both kindness and cruelty.

The ability to choose goodness is what makes moral integrity meaningful. If individuals were inherently good, morality would require no effort or self-reflection. However, the fact that people must navigate ethical dilemmas, resist temptation, and cultivate virtue through conscious effort suggests that goodness is not an automatic trait but a chosen path.

As a postgraduate student of literature, I find Emerson’s idealism valuable in its encouragement of self-trust and personal growth. However, I also recognize that human nature is far more complex than the Transcendentalist vision suggests. Literature teaches us that identity is fluid, and goodness is something to be nurtured, not assumed.

Ultimately, while I admire Emerson’s optimism, I do not fully agree that every individual is inherently good. Instead, I believe that individuals are shaped by a combination of internal inclinations and external influences, and it is through self-awareness and conscious moral effort that one can truly embody goodness.

3) Quote at least one line from the original essay which you found relatable and discuss how it can be relevant in today's time.

One of the most profound lines from Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay Self-Reliance is:

“Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string.”

This simple yet powerful statement captures the essence of Emerson’s philosophy, emphasizing the importance of self-trust, independence, and inner conviction. As a postgraduate student of literature, I find this idea deeply relatable, not only in personal growth but also in the broader context of contemporary society.

Relevance in Today’s Time

In the 21st century, the pressure to conform has intensified due to social media, societal expectations, and professional demands. Many individuals struggle with self-doubt, constantly seeking validation from others rather than trusting their instincts. Emerson’s words serve as a reminder that true fulfillment comes from self-belief rather than external approval.

Personal Growth and Decision-Making

In today’s fast-paced world, people often hesitate to take risks due to fear of failure or societal judgment. Emerson encourages individuals to trust their unique perspectives and capabilities. Whether choosing a career path, making artistic decisions, or standing by personal values, self-trust is essential for growth.

The Age of Social Media and Individualism

Social media platforms create a culture of comparison, where people measure their worth based on likes, followers, and societal trends. Emerson’s philosophy urges individuals to disconnect from these external influences and focus on their inner voice. Authenticity, rather than conformity, leads to true self-expression and fulfillment.

Innovation and Leadership

Many great thinkers, entrepreneurs, and leaders have succeeded because they trusted their instincts. From scientific breakthroughs to artistic revolutions, progress is driven by individuals who challenge norms and believe in their vision. Emerson’s words remind us that groundbreaking ideas often arise from self-reliance.

Mental Well-Being

Trusting oneself also plays a crucial role in mental health. Constantly seeking external validation can lead to anxiety and self-doubt. By embracing self-trust, individuals can cultivate resilience and confidence, fostering a healthier mindset.

Conclusion

Emerson’s call to “trust thyself” remains as relevant today as it was in the 19th century. In a world that often pressures individuals to fit a mold, his words serve as a guiding principle for self-empowerment, authenticity, and personal fulfillment. By embracing self-reliance, we can navigate challenges with confidence, make meaningful contributions, and live life with a sense of purpose.

Existentialism

This blog is written as a task assigned by the head of the Department of English (MKBU), Prof. and Dr. Dilip Barad Sir. Here is the link to the professor's blog link: Click Here.

What is Flipped Learning? 

Click here to learn more about what Flipped Learning is.

Video on Flipped Learning: In Search of Questions for Engaged Learning

 

Video on Flipped Learning Task - Instructions | Sem 2: Hybrid Classes 2021 05 07

In modern education, traditional teaching methods are evolving to foster deeper engagement and critical thinking. Flipped Learning is one such approach that shifts instruction from passive classroom lectures to active, student-centered learning. Instead of receiving information during class, students explore concepts through videos, readings, or online resources beforehand, allowing classroom time for discussions, problem-solving, and interactive activities.

Definition of Existentialism

Video on Existentialism

Existentialism is a philosophical movement that emphasizes individual freedom, choice, and personal responsibility in an indifferent or even absurd universe. It asserts that human beings define their own meaning in life through their actions and decisions rather than adhering to predefined systems of morality or purpose.

A classic definition comes from Jean-Paul Sartre, a leading existentialist thinker:

"Existence precedes essence."

This means that individuals are not born with a fixed purpose (essence) but must shape their identity and values through experience and decision-making. Existentialism often explores themes of anxiety, alienation, authenticity, and the struggle for meaning in an unpredictable world.

Video : 1 :  What is Existentialism?

Existentialism: 

Existentialism is a profound philosophical movement that revolves around the core ideas of individuality, freedom, and passion. Though it is often closely associated with Jean-Paul Sartre, its roots trace back to earlier thinkers like Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Fyodor Dostoevsky. The movement has since evolved, incorporating the perspectives of philosophers such as Martin Heidegger, Franz Kafka, Albert Camus, and Simone de Beauvoir.

The Foundations of Existentialism

Existentialism emphasizes that philosophical inquiry begins with the individual. This means that personal experience and subjective interpretation of existence take precedence over abstract, universal truths. The philosophy can be conceptualized as a triangle, with its three sides representing:

Individuality – Each person must take responsibility for shaping their own existence.

Freedom – The ability to make choices and define one's own meaning.

Passions – The emotions and motivations that drive human action.

God and Existentialism: A Complex Relationship

Belief in God does not necessarily exclude one from existentialist thought. For some thinkers, such as Kierkegaard, faith in God emerges from confronting despair and absurdity. However, Albert Camus, a key figure in absurdist philosophy, argued that believing in God is a form of philosophical suicide, a way to escape the burden of personal responsibility.

Highlighted Insight: Camus refused to be labeled an existentialist, but his writings frequently explore themes of individualism, freedom, and emotional depth, making him an undeniable figure in existential discourse.

The Appeal of Existentialism to the Youth

Existentialism often resonates with younger generations because it addresses themes that deeply affect them, including:

Angst, despair, and absurdity – The struggle to find meaning in a chaotic world.

Freedom and choice – The responsibility of defining one's own path.

Confronting despair – Understanding suffering as a step toward personal growth.

Highlighted Thought: Many young individuals feel a connection to existentialism as it provides a framework to grapple with the challenges of identity and existence.

The Role of Camus and the Absurd

Albert Camus stands at the intersection of existentialism and absurdism. He believed that life is inherently meaningless, and instead of seeking solace in external beliefs, individuals should embrace the absurd. His philosophy encourages people to confront reality directly, without resorting to illusions of meaning or divinity.

Conclusion: Embracing Existential Thought

Existentialism offers a profound and deeply personal way to engage with life. Whether through the recognition of personal freedom, the embrace of individual passions, or the confrontation of absurdity, existentialist thought encourages individuals to actively shape their own existence. It is not a call to despair but an invitation to embrace the complexity and richness of life on one’s own terms.

Key Takeaways:

• Existentialism is not confined to Sartre; it has deep roots in thinkers like Kierkegaard and Nietzsche.

• It is best understood as a triangle of individuality, freedom, and passion.

• Faith and existentialism can coexist, but for thinkers like Camus, belief in God is seen as a philosophical shortcut.

• The philosophy is especially appealing to young people facing questions of identity and meaning.

• Embracing existentialism means confronting life’s absurdities without relying on external justifications.

• By understanding existentialism, one can cultivate a more profound sense of self-awareness and personal freedom, leading to a more authentic existence.

QUESTION: Does existentialism adequately address the psychological need for meaning, or does it risk leaving individuals in a perpetual state of uncertainty and anxiety?

Video 2: The Myth of Sisyphus: The Absurd Reasoning (Feeling of the Absurd)

The Absurdity of Life: Exploring Camus’ “The Myth of Sisyphus”

Albert Camus’ philosophical essay “The Myth of Sisyphus” examines the concept of absurdity in human existence and its implications for the question of suicide. Camus posits that the fundamental philosophical issue is the meaning of life, with suicide being a critical consideration for those overwhelmed by despair and the perceived lack of meaning. He argues that this contemplation arises from the act of thinking, which leads to a realization of life’s absurdity. While many may equate the acknowledgment of life’s absurdity with the justification for suicide, Camus challenges this notion, asserting that recognizing life’s absurdity does not necessitate an escape through death. Instead, he encourages a deeper exploration of absurd reasoning, urging individuals to confront their existential dilemmas without resorting to nihilism or despair.

The Seriousness of Suicide

Camus emphasizes that the most pressing philosophical question is the nature of life and the contemplation of suicide. If one perceives life as devoid of meaning, despair may lead to considering suicide. He writes, “There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide.” The recognition of this issue underscores the importance of understanding why people reach such a conclusion and whether such reasoning is justified.

Absurdity and Individual Thought

Suicide is portrayed as a deeply personal decision, influenced by individual reflection and the realization of life’s absurdity. Camus states, “We are concerned here at the outset with the relationship between individual thought and suicide.” He compares the act of suicide to the creation of a great work of art, suggesting that it is a product of silent contemplation, much like artistic expression. The film Stay illustrates this concept with lines such as “An elegant suicide is the ultimate work of art,” reinforcing the connection between existential thought and self-destruction.

The Alienation of Existence

Acknowledging the absurdity of life can lead to feelings of estrangement and disconnection from one’s surroundings. Camus describes this sensation as “the feeling of absurdity,” arising when an individual perceives life’s futility. This feeling is marked by a divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, highlighting the profound alienation that results from recognizing the absence of inherent meaning.

The Paradox of Meaning

Camus argues that the absence of inherent meaning in life does not equate to it being unworthy of living. He challenges the common belief that refusing to grant a meaning to life necessarily leads to declaring that it is not worth living. He states, “In truth, there is no necessary common measure between these two judgments,” emphasizing that recognizing absurdity does not mandate surrendering to it.

The Role of Thought

The act of thinking critically about existence is what triggers the awareness of absurdity and existential crisis. Camus states, “Beginning to think is beginning to be undermined.” Reflection allows individuals to perceive life’s absurdity, making them question its meaning. However, he cautions against conflating this realization with an inevitable conclusion that life must end in despair.

Challenging Conventional Wisdom

Camus distinguishes between recognizing absurdity and the belief that such recognition leads to a desire for death. He asserts that there is no logical necessity linking the two and that absurdity, rather than being a justification for suicide, should be explored further through reason. He writes, “I cannot know unless I pursue without reckless passion, in the sole light of evidence, the reasoning of which I am here suggesting the source.”

The Pursuit of Absurd Reasoning

Camus invites readers to explore the idea of absurd reasoning rather than succumbing to despair or nihilism. He argues that the individual must face existential contradictions without attempting to escape through suicide. By doing so, one can embrace the absurdity of existence while still engaging with life meaningfully.

Conclusion

Camus’ The Myth of Sisyphus presents a profound exploration of absurdity, suicide, and the quest for meaning in life. By dissecting these themes, individuals can better understand the philosophical underpinnings of their existence and approach the concept of life with a renewed perspective. Ultimately, Camus does not advocate for despair but rather a courageous engagement with the absurd, encouraging individuals to find their own paths to meaning and fulfillment.

Video 3: The Myth of Sisyphus: the notion of philosophical suicide

The Concept of the Absurd in the Philosophy of Camus

The provided text explores the philosophical concept of the absurd, primarily through the ideas of Albert Camus. It examines how the absurd emerges from the confrontation between human beings and the irrationality of the world. The discussion highlights the distinction between recognizing the absurd and embracing it, emphasizing the rejection of what Camus terms "philosophical suicide." Additionally, it critiques existentialist thought for seeking transcendence or hope in response to absurdity, a position Camus rejects. Instead, Camus advocates for accepting the absurd without resorting to faith or denial. The discussion concludes by asserting that true engagement with the absurd requires a courageous confrontation rather than an escape.

Absurdity as a Confrontation

The absurd does not exist independently in either human beings or the world. It arises from their interaction, requiring a confrontation between the two. The world may be irrational, but without human consciousness to perceive this irrationality, the absurd cannot exist. This duality underscores that the absurd is not a personal failing or an inherent quality of the universe but a shared experience that highlights the complexities of existence.

Philosophical Suicide

Embracing the absurd involves acknowledging its consequences rather than seeking escape through denial. The text underscores that many individuals, upon recognizing the absurd, attempt to escape its implications. Camus criticizes such attempts, labeling them as "philosophical suicide." This form of escape manifests in various ways, including adherence to religious or philosophical ideologies that impose meaning onto an otherwise meaningless world. Camus argues that this stance prevents individuals from confronting the reality of their existence.

Existentialist Critique

Camus distinguishes his philosophy from existentialism, rejecting existentialist solutions that invoke faith or transcendence as a means of coping with the absurd. He critiques existentialist thinkers for recognizing the absurd but failing to embrace it fully. Instead of accepting the absurd, existentialists make an appeal to religion in its broadest sense, seeking forced hope. Camus contends that this approach constitutes an attempt to escape the absurd rather than engage with it.

Hope vs. Reason

An absurdist perspective holds that there is no place for hope, as reason cannot provide satisfying answers to life’s irrationality. The text draws a clear distinction between the absurd and the concept of hope. While traditional thought associates purpose with happiness, Camus challenges this notion by asserting that meaning cannot be artificially constructed. The pursuit of hope through rationality is futile, as it seeks to impose coherence on an inherently incoherent world.

The Leap

Camus critiques the existentialist tendency to take a "leap" into faith or transcendence, arguing that such an approach avoids the true challenge of confronting the absurd. This leap is considered an easy way out, an attempt to bypass the discomfort that comes with acknowledging the absurd. Camus asserts that true philosophical engagement requires remaining on the "dizzying crest" of the absurd without resorting to abstract reasoning or illusory hope.

The Role of Evidence

An absurdist must remain faithful to the evidence that supports the existence of the absurd. The text contrasts this approach with existentialist thought, which often employs abstract reasoning to justify beliefs that provide comfort. Camus insists that reasoning should remain grounded in reality, acknowledging the limitations of human understanding while resisting the temptation to fabricate meaning where none exists. This commitment to evidence fosters a deeper engagement with the absurd, encouraging a more honest confrontation with existence.

Courageous Confrontation

The discussion concludes by emphasizing that the true challenge lies in maintaining a stance of acceptance and struggle amidst the discomfort of absurdity. While it may be tempting to escape the absurd through faith or denial, Camus argues that genuine engagement demands resilience and integrity. This confrontation with the absurd is not an act of despair but a courageous acceptance of the contradictions inherent in human existence.

Conclusion

The text provides an in-depth exploration of the philosophical landscape surrounding the notion of the absurd. It challenges readers to reflect on their own understanding of existence and the implications of embracing the absurd rather than seeking refuge in denial or false hope. Engaging with the absurd is not an act of resignation but a profound acceptance of life’s complexities. This perspective aligns with Camus’ philosophy, which insists that meaning must not be imposed artificially but must instead be confronted with intellectual honesty and philosophical courage.

QUESTION : Do you think Camus’ rejection of hope makes his philosophy less accessible to individuals seeking purpose in life?

Video 4: Dadaism, Nihilism and Existentialism

The Dada Movement and Its Philosophical Underpinnings

The Dada movement emerged in 1916 as a response to the horrors of World War I. This movement, often associated with nihilism, was actually a rebellion against the values and civilization that had led to war. It was not merely an art movement but a tool for questioning and critiquing societal norms. Artists like Hugo Ball, Bianco, Jean Arp, and Lazaro, disgusted by the war, moved to Zurich and founded the movement. They believed that the war was a consequence of the old values, and therefore, their goal was to question every value rather than to create new ones.

Origin of Dadaism

• The Dada movement arose in 1916 as an opposition to the destruction caused by World War I.

• It was founded by artists who sought to reject the societal norms that had led to the war.

• Unlike other artistic movements, Dadaism was not about creation but about questioning values.

Questioning Values Rather Than Creating

• Dadaism did not aim to establish new values but sought to dismantle existing ones.

• The movement was devoid of any rules because its purpose was to question and reject traditional values.

• It was vulnerable to accusations of nihilism, yet its essence was a critique of accepted societal norms.

Dadaism Beyond Art

• While often categorized as an art movement, Dadaism was fundamentally a philosophical stance against the prevailing order.

• It was not about artistic expression alone but about challenging the values that dictated human existence.

• The movement provided a space for rethinking and redefining cultural principles.

Freedom of Thought and Language

• Dadaists sought to liberate themselves from traditional norms, including language.

• Hugo Ball’s manifesto reflects this by rejecting words and values that were imposed by society.

• He proposed that a tree could be called “plouplou” to demonstrate the arbitrary nature of language and meaning.

Comparison with Existentialism

• Just as existentialism emerged after World War II in response to the absurdity of life, Dadaism arose as a reaction to war.

• Both movements shared a dissatisfaction with the existing world order.

• While existentialism urged individuals to define themselves, Dadaism encouraged questioning societal values.

Encouragement of Individualism

• Dadaism pushed individuals to reject imposed values and create their own.

• Hugo Ball suggested that by saying “Dada,” one could break free from the constraints of imposed traditions.

• This idea was central to the movement’s philosophy.

Critique of Cultural and Philosophical Frameworks

• The movement questioned the cultural structures that had led to war.

• It forced people to reconsider the validity of values they had taken for granted.

• By challenging what was considered art, Dadaism opened the door to broader philosophical inquiries.

Art as Inquiry Rather Than Creation

• Dadaism redefined art by prioritizing inquiry over traditional artistic production.

• Works such as those by Jean Arp were designed to provoke the question: “Is this really art?”

• This questioning led to a reevaluation of art’s role in society.

Rejection of Nihilism

• While often linked to nihilism, Dadaism was not about negation but about critical inquiry.

• It did not advocate for the absence of values but rather the need to rethink them.

• Just as existentialism is not nihilistic, Dadaism sought transformation rather than destruction.

Historical Context and Impact

• The movement emerged as a direct response to World War I.

• The devastation of war highlighted the failures of traditional values and led to a search for alternatives.

• This urgency made Dadaism a relevant and immediate critique of its time.

Cultural Legacy of Dadaism

• The movement influenced later art movements such as Surrealism and Performance Art.

• Its emphasis on absurdity and questioning continues to resonate in contemporary conceptual art.

• By challenging the status quo, Dadaism remains a significant force in discussions on art, identity, and philosophy.

Conclusion

The Dada movement represents a crucial shift in cultural history, emerging as a response to the devastation of World War I. It was not a nihilistic movement but a rebellion against the values that had led to war. Dadaism questioned the foundations of civilization, urging individuals to forge their own identities and values. Just as existentialism emerged to address the absurdity of life, Dadaism arose to critique the absurdity of war-driven values. Its commitment to inquiry and individualism makes it a lasting movement that continues to provoke reflection on the nature of meaning and societal transformation.

QUESRION : If Dadaism was a reaction to World War I, can we see any modern artistic or philosophical movements that function similarly in response to contemporary crises?

Video 5: Existentialism - a gloomy philosophy

Existentialism - A Gloomy Philosophy?

Existentialism is often accused of being a gloomy philosophy. While there is a truth to this claim, we must look at the whole picture.

The Perceived Gloominess of Existentialism

One of the primary reasons existentialism is thought of as a gloomy philosophy is its focus on notions such as anxiety, despair, and absurdity. These themes never seem to leave the arena of argument, which leads many to associate existentialism with negativity. However, all of these so-called negative subjects are only brought into discussion so that we can find a solution to them. It is the conclusion of the philosophy that we must focus on and try to achieve.

Finding Relief and Personal Meaning

According to different philosophers of the field, one can find relief from these recurring struggles by believing in God, finding a truth that is true for oneself, or even embracing the absurd. Most importantly, it is the individual who should judge and weigh every value and choose their own meaning in life. Once this meaning is determined, one must take responsibility for their choice and accept the consequences of it.

Existentialism and Narcissism

Another misconception often heard is that existentialism is a narcissistic philosophy. However, being an individual does not mean being a narcissist. A person could either choose to be a part of a herd and die just as another brick in the wall or look inwardly and discover themselves. As Nietzsche puts it, one must become who they are.

The Distinction Between Existentialism and Nihilism

A common belief is that existentialism will inevitably lead to nihilism. Some claim that just as a beer or a cigarette leads to heroin, so does existentialism to nihilism. However, this is far from the truth. Existentialism is not nihilism. While nihilism denies the possibility of any meaning, existentialism suggests that individuals can create their own meaning through choices and actions.

Existentialism as a Response to Despair

For understanding its perceived gloominess, we must take a look at its history. Existentialism was a post-war movement that was popularized as a response to the world war, where despair and absurdity lingered at every corner for every individual. After World War II, people's lives seemed to have become meaningless and filled with despair. It was in such an atmosphere that existentialism came to people's rescue and offered a cure.

Conclusion

Existentialism is often misunderstood as a gloomy philosophy due to its engagement with anxiety, despair, and absurdity. However, these discussions aim to guide individuals toward finding solutions and personal meaning. By emphasizing personal choice and responsibility, existentialism offers a way to confront life's uncertainties. While some claim that it is narcissistic or a pathway to nihilism, existentialism, in reality, promotes self-discovery and authenticity. Emerging as a response to the despair following World War II, it provides a framework for individuals to create meaning in a seemingly meaningless world.

QUESTION : The video mentions that existentialists offer various ways to cope with existential struggles, such as faith in God, personal truth, or embracing the absurd. Which approach do you think is most effective in addressing modern existential dilemmas?

Video 6: Existentialism and Nihilism: Is it one and the same?

Existentialism and Nihilism: Is it One and the Same?

Existentialism and nihilism are often conflated, but they are fundamentally different philosophical concepts. Existentialists have consistently opposed nihilism, recognizing it as a threat to individuality and human meaning. The perspectives of key thinkers such as Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Cioran, and Camus highlight these distinctions and illustrate how existentialism actively resists nihilism.

Existentialism vs. Nihilism: A Fundamental Opposition

Existentialists actively oppose nihilism, which they view as a philosophy that denies meaning and leads to despair. They argue that individuals must take responsibility for their own existence and create their own meanings and values. This stark contrast between the two philosophies underscores the existentialist commitment to personal agency and engagement with life.

Kierkegaard’s Subjectivity as a Response to Nihilism

Søren Kierkegaard defines nihilism as the loss of individuality. His entire philosophical endeavor centers around championing subjectivity as a means of overcoming nihilistic tendencies. By promoting personal engagement with one’s existence and choices, he provides an antidote to the nihilistic drift toward detachment and despair. Kierkegaard believes that true individuality can only be achieved through subjective experience and the pursuit of personal truth.

Nietzsche’s Fight Against the Devaluation of Values

Friedrich Nietzsche views nihilism as a decline in values, where the highest ideals devalue themselves. He perceives this as a crisis threatening human existence. To combat nihilism, Nietzsche argues for the creation of new values in the absence of absolute truths. His concept of the “Übermensch” (Overman) embodies the ideal of transcending nihilism by affirming life, establishing personal values, and asserting one’s existence against a backdrop of absurdity.

Cioran’s Nihilistic Consent and the Dangers of Passivity

Emil Cioran provides a nuanced perspective on nihilism, engaging with themes of despair and suicide. He exemplifies a form of nihilistic consent, characterized by passivity rather than active rebellion. Despite contemplating suicide, he ultimately remains passive, failing to realize that all suicides bear the responsibility of resisting the temptation of suicide. This passivity prevents him from engaging in the kind of rebellion existentialists advocate. His position serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of resignation in the face of despair.

Camus and Rebellion Against Absurdity

Albert Camus argues that rebellion is the only proper response to the absurdity of life. In his work The Myth of Sisyphus, he explores the absurd condition of human existence and asserts that acknowledging absurdity does not necessitate despair. Instead, it calls for active rebellion. Camus contends that individuals must refuse to succumb to nihilism and should find personal meaning despite life’s inherent meaninglessness. Through this rebellion, individuals can attain fulfillment and authenticity.

The Role of Responsibility in Rebellion

Confronting nihilism requires individuals to take responsibility for their choices and actions. This responsibility extends beyond personal burdens and calls for active engagement with life. Recognizing the temptation of nihilism challenges individuals to resist passivity and embrace rebellion. This proactive stance fosters resilience and creativity, enabling individuals to shape their own existence despite existential uncertainties.

The Interconnectedness of Existential Philosophies

Various existential philosophers, despite their differing approaches, converge on the necessity of confronting nihilism. From Kierkegaard’s emphasis on subjectivity to Nietzsche’s creation of new values and Camus’s advocacy for rebellion, each thinker provides a unique perspective on resisting nihilism. Their philosophies collectively challenge individuals to seek meaning and authenticity in their lives, even in the face of existential doubt.

Conclusion

The distinction between existentialism and nihilism is crucial to understanding their philosophical implications. While nihilism leads to despair and passivity, existentialism encourages individuals to take responsibility for their existence and actively engage with life. Through the insights of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Cioran, and Camus, it becomes clear that existentialism fundamentally opposes nihilism, offering a path toward personal meaning and authenticity. This resistance to nihilism underscores the existentialist belief in human agency and the importance of crafting one’s own destiny in an indifferent universe.

Video 7: Let us introduce Existentialism again!

Existentialism and Nihilism: Is it One and the Same?

Existentialism and nihilism are often conflated, but they are fundamentally different philosophical concepts. Existentialists have consistently opposed nihilism, recognizing it as a threat to individuality and human meaning. The perspectives of key thinkers such as Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Cioran, and Camus highlight these distinctions and illustrate how existentialism actively resists nihilism.

Existentialism vs. Nihilism: A Fundamental Opposition

Existentialists actively oppose nihilism, which they view as a philosophy that denies meaning and leads to despair. They argue that individuals must take responsibility for their own existence and create their own meanings and values. This stark contrast between the two philosophies underscores the existentialist commitment to personal agency and engagement with life.

Kierkegaard’s Subjectivity as a Response to Nihilism

Søren Kierkegaard defines nihilism as the loss of individuality. His entire philosophical endeavor centers around championing subjectivity as a means of overcoming nihilistic tendencies. By promoting personal engagement with one’s existence and choices, he provides an antidote to the nihilistic drift toward detachment and despair. Kierkegaard believes that true individuality can only be achieved through subjective experience and the pursuit of personal truth.

Nietzsche’s Fight Against the Devaluation of Values

Friedrich Nietzsche views nihilism as a decline in values, where the highest ideals devalue themselves. He perceives this as a crisis threatening human existence. To combat nihilism, Nietzsche argues for the creation of new values in the absence of absolute truths. His concept of the “Übermensch” (Overman) embodies the ideal of transcending nihilism by affirming life, establishing personal values, and asserting one’s existence against a backdrop of absurdity.

Cioran’s Nihilistic Consent and the Dangers of Passivity

Emil Cioran provides a nuanced perspective on nihilism, engaging with themes of despair and suicide. He exemplifies a form of nihilistic consent, characterized by passivity rather than active rebellion. Despite contemplating suicide, he ultimately remains passive, failing to realize that all suicides bear the responsibility of resisting the temptation of suicide. This passivity prevents him from engaging in the kind of rebellion existentialists advocate. His position serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of resignation in the face of despair.

Camus and Rebellion Against Absurdity

Albert Camus argues that rebellion is the only proper response to the absurdity of life. In his work The Myth of Sisyphus, he explores the absurd condition of human existence and asserts that acknowledging absurdity does not necessitate despair. Instead, it calls for active rebellion. Camus contends that individuals must refuse to succumb to nihilism and should find personal meaning despite life’s inherent meaninglessness. Through this rebellion, individuals can attain fulfillment and authenticity.

The Role of Responsibility in Rebellion

Confronting nihilism requires individuals to take responsibility for their choices and actions. This responsibility extends beyond personal burdens and calls for active engagement with life. Recognizing the temptation of nihilism challenges individuals to resist passivity and embrace rebellion. This proactive stance fosters resilience and creativity, enabling individuals to shape their own existence despite existential uncertainties.

The Interconnectedness of Existential Philosophies

Various existential philosophers, despite their differing approaches, converge on the necessity of confronting nihilism. From Kierkegaard’s emphasis on subjectivity to Nietzsche’s creation of new values and Camus’s advocacy for rebellion, each thinker provides a unique perspective on resisting nihilism. Their philosophies collectively challenge individuals to seek meaning and authenticity in their lives, even in the face of existential doubt.

Conclusion

The distinction between existentialism and nihilism is crucial to understanding their philosophical implications. While nihilism leads to despair and passivity, existentialism encourages individuals to take responsibility for their existence and actively engage with life. Through the insights of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Cioran, and Camus, it becomes clear that existentialism fundamentally opposes nihilism, offering a path toward personal meaning and authenticity. This resistance to nihilism underscores the existentialist belief in human agency and the importance of crafting one’s own destiny in an indifferent universe. 

QUESTION : How does existentialism promote human agency in an indifferent universe?

Video 8: Explain like I'm Five: Existentialism and Nietzsche:

Introduction to Existentialism and Nietzsche

The video titled Explain Like I'm Five: Existentialism and Nietzsche presents the complex ideas of existentialism and the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche in a way that is accessible to young children. Using simple language and relatable examples, the video introduces key philosophical concepts such as questioning authority, moral relativism, and personal freedom. The interactive nature of the discussion allows children to explore these ideas while engaging in critical thinking about the rules they follow in their daily lives.

Introduction to Nietzsche

The video begins by introducing Friedrich Nietzsche, a famous thinker known for his philosophy. His ideas, particularly those related to existentialism, are explained in a way that is understandable for children. The narrator simplifies the key aspects of Nietzsche's thought, making it engaging and thought-provoking for a young audience.

Child-Friendly Philosophy

The concepts of existentialism and Nietzsche’s philosophy are explained in simple terms. The approach makes complex ideas more accessible, ensuring that children can grasp fundamental philosophical questions about rules, authority, and personal values. The discussion fosters curiosity and encourages independent thinking.

Questioning Authority

One of the central themes of the video is questioning the rules imposed by parents and authority figures. The children in the video discuss which rules they find silly or unnecessary, highlighting the arbitrary nature of some societal norms. This discussion leads to an exploration of Nietzsche’s philosophy, which challenges the need for universal moral standards.

Existentialism Defined

The idea of existentialism is presented as a philosophy that rejects the notion of universal morality. Instead, it emphasizes individual freedom and the responsibility to create personal values. By presenting existentialism in this manner, the video encourages children to think about the origins of rules and the possibility of shaping their own moral framework.

The Übermensch Concept

Nietzsche’s concept of the Übermensch is introduced in the video. The Übermensch represents an individual who creates their own values and lives beyond conventional morality. The video demonstrates this idea through an interactive activity where children experience the concept in action, reinforcing the philosophical lesson in a relatable way.

Engaging Dialogue

The interactive format of the video allows children to express their opinions and feelings about philosophical ideas. Their responses, including strong emotions such as dislike towards Nietzsche, show how philosophy can evoke personal reactions. The discussion format helps children engage with the material actively rather than passively receiving information.

Critical Thinking Encouraged

By questioning the nature of rules and morality, the video promotes critical thinking among children. It encourages them to analyze why certain rules exist and whether they serve a meaningful purpose. This approach fosters independent thought and a deeper understanding of personal values.

Existentialism and Individuality

Existentialism emphasizes the individual’s freedom to define their own values and meaning in life. Nietzsche challenges the idea of absolute truths, encouraging personal exploration. This philosophy is vital for children’s development as independent thinkers, as it fosters creativity and self-expression. By understanding existentialist ideas, children feel empowered in making choices about their own beliefs and actions.

Understanding Authority

The dialogue between the children about parental rules highlights the common tension between authority and personal freedom. Nietzsche’s philosophy provides a framework for understanding this dynamic, prompting children to critically evaluate the reasoning behind rules they may find restrictive or unnecessary. This perspective helps them navigate their relationship with authority figures more thoughtfully.

Moral Relativism

The video introduces the concept of moral relativism, which asserts that morality is not universal but subjective and context-dependent. By understanding that different cultures and individuals may have varying moral standards, children learn to appreciate diverse perspectives. This lesson broadens their worldview and encourages open-mindedness.

Empowerment Through the Übermensch

Nietzsche’s idea of the Übermensch serves as a metaphor for aspiring to reach one’s highest potential. The concept inspires children to challenge societal norms and expectations while taking ownership of their actions and decisions. By promoting responsibility and self-accountability, the video encourages children to become more self-reliant and confident in their choices.

Philosophy in Everyday Life

By discussing existentialist ideas in a relatable context, the video demonstrates how philosophy applies to everyday life. It shows that philosophy is not just an abstract concept but a practical tool for understanding personal experiences. Encouraging children to think philosophically fosters a lifelong love of learning and inquiry.

Expressing Opinions

The children’s candid reactions to Nietzsche’s ideas, including strong emotions, highlight the importance of expressing opinions and engaging in discussions. The video promotes emotional intelligence by showing that it is natural to have differing views on philosophical topics. This aspect reinforces the idea that disagreement is a valuable part of intellectual growth.

Education and Resources

The video concludes with a promotion for DonorsChoose.org, an organization that helps teachers obtain educational supplies. By connecting philosophy to broader educational themes, it underscores how critical thinking and access to education are foundational to understanding complex ideas.

Conclusion

Through its engaging and interactive approach, the video provides an accessible introduction to existentialism and Nietzsche’s philosophy. It encourages young viewers to explore philosophical concepts, question authority, and think critically about morality and personal freedom. By fostering independent thought and self-expression, the video serves as a valuable educational resource for children learning about philosophy.

Video 9: Why I like Existentialism? Eric Dodson  

Why I Like Existentialism?

Existentialism is a philosophical perspective that deeply resonates with me. It emphasizes individual experience, meaning-making, and personal responsibility in a world that does not inherently provide meaning. Here are the key reasons why I appreciate existentialism:

Individual Responsibility

Existentialism stresses that individuals are responsible for their own choices and actions. There is no predetermined path or destiny; instead, people must create their own purpose through their decisions and experiences.

Authenticity

One of the core ideas in existentialism is living authentically. This means being true to oneself and acting in ways that align with personal values rather than conforming to societal expectations. The philosophy encourages self-awareness and genuine living.

Freedom and Choice

Existentialists believe that people have the freedom to make choices. With this freedom comes the weight of responsibility, as each choice shapes one's life and identity. There are no external authorities dictating how one should live; individuals must decide for themselves.

Confronting Anxiety and Meaninglessness

Existentialism does not shy away from life's uncertainties. It acknowledges that existence can be filled with anxiety, doubt, and even a sense of meaninglessness. Instead of ignoring these feelings, existentialists embrace them and seek to create meaning despite uncertainty.

Subjective Meaning

Since the world does not provide inherent meaning, people must find or create their own. Existentialists argue that meaning is subjective and personal, shaped by one's experiences, values, and interpretations rather than dictated by external forces.

Human Experience as Central

Existentialism values lived experience. It focuses on human emotions, struggles, and consciousness rather than abstract theories or rigid doctrines. It encourages individuals to engage deeply with life and understand their place in the world.

Rejection of Absolute Truths

Existentialism challenges the idea of universal truths or absolute moral codes. Instead, it suggests that truth is personal and relative, shaped by individual experiences and perspectives. This encourages a more flexible and open-minded approach to understanding life.

Embracing Uncertainty

Rather than seeking definite answers, existentialists accept that life is uncertain. This perspective allows people to navigate the unknown with courage and resilience, focusing on the journey rather than searching for ultimate conclusions.

In conclusion, existentialism appeals to me because it embraces human freedom, responsibility, and the search for personal meaning. It provides a framework for navigating life’s complexities while encouraging authenticity and self-discovery. By acknowledging the uncertainty of existence, existentialism empowers individuals to shape their own destinies and live meaningfully.

Video 10: Let us sum up: From Essentialism to Existentialism

Existentialism: Crash Course Philosophy

Introduction to Life’s Meaning

• The discussion begins with a fundamental question: What gives life meaning? Various aspects such as religion, love, work, and personal passions are explored as potential sources of meaning.

• The search for meaning is a universal pursuit, and different individuals derive it from different sources, whether predetermined or self-created.

Essentialism and Predetermined Essence

• Ancient philosophers like Plato and Aristotle believed that everything possesses an essence, a core property defining its existence.

• This essentialist view suggests that humans have an inherent purpose instilled before birth, guiding them towards a specific path.

• The idea of essentialism remained dominant for centuries, shaping perspectives on human purpose and destiny.

Challenges to Essentialism

• In the late 19th century, thinkers began to challenge the notion of predetermined essence.

• Friedrich Nietzsche introduced nihilism, the belief in the ultimate meaninglessness of life, questioning the traditional views of purpose and destiny.

• This shift in perspective paved the way for existentialist thought.

Existence Precedes Essence

• Jean-Paul Sartre introduced the idea that humans exist first and define their own essence through their choices and actions.

• Existentialism asserts that there is no predefined path; rather, individuals must create their own meaning and purpose.

• This perspective was radical, as it countered traditional beliefs that assigned meaning through divine or societal structures.

The Absurd and the Search for Meaning

• Existentialists describe the contradiction between humanity’s need for meaning and the universe’s inherent meaninglessness as ‘the absurd.’

• This concept highlights the struggle to find answers in an answerless world, emphasizing personal responsibility in creating meaning.

Freedom and Moral Responsibility

• Sartre emphasized that humans are “condemned to be free,” meaning that with no absolute guidelines, individuals must shape their own moral code.

• Traditional authorities such as religion, government, and societal norms offer no definite answers, leaving individuals to make authentic choices.

Living Authentically

• Sartre argued that authenticity requires embracing one’s freedom and taking full responsibility for one’s choices.

• If individuals follow predefined paths without self-reflection, they are living in ‘bad faith,’ avoiding the responsibility of defining their own purpose.

Illustrative Anecdote: Sartre’s Student

• Sartre presented a moral dilemma of a young man torn between joining the military for a greater cause or staying with his elderly mother who needed him.

• Existentialism asserts that no universal moral theory can provide an answer; the young man’s decision would only be meaningful if made authentically, based on his own chosen values.

Personal and Global Implications

• Existentialism posits that meaning is subjective and self-created rather than imposed externally.

• On an individual level, personal fulfillment comes from defining one’s own purpose rather than adhering to societal expectations.

• On a broader scale, justice and order exist only if individuals actively establish and uphold them, reinforcing the importance of conscious moral engagement.

Conclusion

While existentialism may seem bleak to some, it also offers empowerment, emphasizing human freedom and responsibility. Meaning exists only if individuals assign it, rejecting external definitions and embracing self-determined purpose.

References: 

Barad, Dilip. “Existentialism: Video Resources.” Dilip Barad | Teacher Blog, 19 Sept. 2016, blog.dilipbarad.com/2016/09/existentialism-video-resources.html. 

“Flipped Learning Network.” Dilip Barad | Teacher Blog, 24 Jan. 2016, blog.dilipbarad.com/2016/01/flipped-learning-network.html.

Thank you !